Kate Middleton - Again

[flip_flop]

Am I missing something here?

The world has seen Kate Middleton's breasts.

So what.

They are just a pair of tits - its not as though the photos are of her bottomless with legs akimbo.

I can, a bit, understand the privacy argument, but the reports all seem to be more concerned with the fact her breasts have been seen and not the invasion of privacy (incidentally, if I understand correctly, it would be perfectly legal for me to walk along a beach taking photos of whoever I liked.........so what is the difference here?).

It was a pretty scummy thing to do, but the bruhaha that has ensued is ridiculous.

[daffy654]

Typical male reaction on this website and others.
Many men won't bother to look at the photos because she has small breasts. If she was blessed with big boobs they would all be happy to ogle her.

[tonyav]

Well daffy, you know how we work lol.

[Sqad]

daffy....blimey.......are you telling us that male ABers are "typical males."

Never!

Next description will be that female ABers are "typical females"...now THAT would be stretching credibility.

[baza]

where were the security people or did they employ G4S, as the villa could be seen from the road then surely the road can be seen from the villa. Perhaps the guards should go to specsavers, other opticians are available.

[tonyav]

sqad, shhhh you'll get us a kicking.

[Sqad]

tony...LOL.

[cupid04]

Squad, I heard you only liked big boobs!

[daffy654]

Combustible, yes I am quite flat chested and have been embarrassed by it my whole life. It doesn't help when some men say hurtful things about flat chested women (fried eggs, ironing board, built like a young boy etc.). At least my boobs won't be round my waist as I age though :P


Maybe I should start judging men by the size of their trouser bulge :)

[Psybbo]

Sqad, Have a look at Jem's warning for you in Jokes

[Sqad]

cupid......WELL.....I have changed over the years.
Vast and scientific experience has taught me that it isn't the size of the t1ts but their sensitivity and also the smaller ones tend to be more sensitive(daffy, i will give you a trial) giving the male that "dominating feeling. Also the size, sensitivity and size/breast ratio of the nipple is all important.

I have only studied about 353 pairs of breasts, so my research is ongoing.

Inverted nipples are a no no despite the size of the breasts...the nipple /breast ratio being zero of course.

[trt]

I prefer cue perky tits, much more attractive than those that hang down to the waist full of blotches.

[flip_flop]

Then I'm obviously not a typical male...............................I've always preferred small tits. If anything, I find big tits a bit of a turn off.

[tonyav]

Well, you know what they say, more than an handful is a waste.

[chaptazbru]

^ I thought it was 'more than a mouthful' ooooops !!

[MissCommando]

snags, your answer made me laugh.

I don't think it matters if Kate and William sue their arses, the damage is already done. I've not seen the pics myself but I was shocked that she went topless. I don't see the reason that anyone should go topless. Ok, she didn't expect to get photographed but I guess she's only got herself to blame.

[gness]

Tony....I fear we have made you oversensitive. Which of the females on here would like to be described as typical? I have never striven to be typical....quite the reverse.

Daffy....small tits...big tits....doesn't matter. It's what you do with them that counts. Or not if you choose before I get into trouble. ;-)

[emmie]

so no one blames the scummy photographer, or the grubby magazine they work for.