Kate Middleton - Again

[flip_flop]

Am I missing something here?

The world has seen Kate Middleton's breasts.

So what.

They are just a pair of tits - its not as though the photos are of her bottomless with legs akimbo.

I can, a bit, understand the privacy argument, but the reports all seem to be more concerned with the fact her breasts have been seen and not the invasion of privacy (incidentally, if I understand correctly, it would be perfectly legal for me to walk along a beach taking photos of whoever I liked.........so what is the difference here?).

It was a pretty scummy thing to do, but the bruhaha that has ensued is ridiculous.

[Psybbo]

I agree with you em10, what they do in private is their business.
must make sure I close the curtains tonight and not frighten the natives

[weecalf]

Middleton Flyer dead heated in 5.25 at Newcastle.if we hadda known we cudda left the bookies bust so to speak.

[emmie]

I feel more sorry for her as the days go on. If the royal family doesn't support and protect her, she will be another Diana.

[DTCwordfan]

One thing that she has going in her favour is that she has a lot more brains to think all of this through and manage it, and she is that much older than Diana.

[DTCwordfan]

tony, do you have your cameras at the ready, looks like we have an expedition to Northern Ireland to "visit" Sibbo's place and publish the pics here!

[emmie]

perhaps, but if you were being followed by these idiots round the clock, snapping away at you till you can't breathe, wouldn't you fall off a bit. I also don't think Diana was stupid, she was just too young to have dealt with all that nonsense, adding a stupid husband who seemed more intent on getting his end away with his mistress.

[sunny-dave]

I really don' t give a flying one about this - for tits to be of any particular interest to me they need to be attached to a flesh and blood person - not just a grainy (presumably - I can't be arsed to look for the pictures) long-lens pap snap.

To refute (at least in my case) daffy's assertion - I don't give a stuff about size - it's the person behind them that is the turn-on ...

[Sqad]

\\\\- it's the person behind them that is the turn-on ...\\\

"Can't find a character to denote ...nervous cough"

[DTCwordfan]

I agree with dave on this - actually I have a preference for smaller boobs on a woman; they tend to be more sensitive. However, ultimately, good sex is in the brains - of both you and your partner.

[Sqad]

\\\ ultimately, good sex is in the brains - of both you and your partner.\\

"Can't find character for....explosive cough"

[MissCommando]

I have sensitive breasts and they're not small so I break your stereotyping!

[DTCwordfan]

where's the camera?

[Sqad]

Miss C.........not stereotyping...just generalising...........;-)

[tenrec]

Why the hell did she have her top off?

[Psybbo]

Take 500mls ibuprofen and have a lie down in a darkened room, Sqad

[Sqad]

sibby.....LOL....500mls........that half a litre!

[gness]

Sqad! Behave now. Ladies...I think the guys are on a fishing trip. By the time this has died down we'll all have disclosed the size and sensitivity of our boobs. x

[DTCwordfan]

that will cure anything.....probably even make Kate's boobs inflate as well.

[Psybbo]

oops 200mg

[flip_flop]

"If the royal family doesn't support and protect her, she will be another Diana."

If she stays married to the future King, I don't really see that happening, but if she doesn't and starts shagging an Egyptian and is driven at high speed by a drunk man, then possibly.