Only the Germans......

[ZedBloke]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-20523950
"It is unthinkable that any sexual act with an animal is punished without proof that the animal has come to any harm," he said, adding that animals are capable of showing what they do, or do not, want to do.

"We see animals as partners and not as a means of gratification. We don't force them to do anything. Animals are much easier to understand than women," Mr Kiok claimed.
Do you find this a little worrying from our Teutonic friends? I suppose I can agree with Mr Kiok's last point though!

[naomi24]

Craft, surprise, surprise. Thank you for the apology.

[craft1948]

You're welcome.

[Answerprancer]

Why "only the Germans"? Ah, I see Gromit has spotted something.

[jno]

you really think bestiality is illegal only because the Bible says it should be, naomi? In an increasingly secular society, do you think most people would be unconcerned if it was legalised?

If that's the case it would hardly explain why the Germans are backtracking.

[Dolly1308]

I have never heard of anything so absolutely disgusting -sex with animals .Are (Is) there not enough people on this Earth for people to confine their sexual activities to their own kind and not include animals ?
I feel physically sick on reading this report and hope it gets banned worldwide( the unnatural activity I mean).
What a sick place our World is becoming .We need another Flood as in Noah's Ark time .

[RATTER15]

Gross gross gross gross!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But then again: if you can get a woolly jumber, a sh@g and a decent meal from one animal...........

[naomi24]

jno, //you really think bestiality is illegal only because the Bible says it should be, naomi?//

No – and I didn’t say that - but since your post addressed OG’s, your observation was rather amusingly ironic.

// In an increasingly secular society, do you think most people would be unconcerned if it was legalised?//

No, I don’t – and I didn’t say that either. However, the fact that they wouldn’t be unconcerned rather confirms that the religious don’t hold the monopoly on morals.

Dolly, //What a sick place our World is becoming .We need another Flood as in Noah's Ark time .//

What makes you think this is new? It’s been happening for millennia – hence the biblical reference to it. Your wish for a repeat of God’s initial solution, which clearly didn’t work the first time, is rather worrying though. Are you sure about that?

[jake-the-peg]

Did we actually get to 28 posts before someone mentioned the Welsh?

Where's my QI style flashing light and Klaxon?

[murraymints]

mein Gott !!!

[Canary42]

Where do you draw the line ?

In this country I often see people kissing their dogs in public which I find extremely yukky. I've also seen people kissing horses ! Yuuuuuukkkkkk.

Or is it only intercourse which is offensive to the "no sex please we're Brits"

[anotheoldgit]

Animals themselves are not 'squeaky clean' how many times have we humans had to endure oversexed dogs attacking our legs?

There should be a law against it, off to the compound I say. :0)

[Ric.ror]

Honestly the smell alone ........

[chaptazbru]

How anyone can want sex with an animal is beyond me. I read of a case not too long ago of a man in America who regulalry raped his large dog until his grandson walked in and caught him. The picture of that poor dog will haunt me forever, the sad and despairing look on her face was heartbreaking and all her flank was rubbed raw. She was thankfully rehomed and the difference in her in just a few short weeks was amazing. She was a happy dog and loving her new life with decent people. I simpy canot believe bestiality is legal in some places. Poor animals.

[ludwig]

// Animals themselves are not 'squeaky clean' //

Too right AOG. They act all sweet and innocent but no-one should be fooled. They're gagging for it.

[Quizmonkey]

Dolly and Chapta need to get real and not be so naive. This is hardly anything new: a high percentage (not sure exactly but 17% comes to mind) of boys growing up in rural areas have their first non-solo sexual experience with a non-human. If you forget any biblical objection, which has no relevance today anyway, and your obvious kneejerk reaction, what is there honestly to object to? Each to his own.

[ludwig]

// what is there honestly to object to? //

Well, technically it's rape. There are laws against causing animals unecessary suffering.

[whiskeryron]

I despair is nothing safe?
http://www.panoramio.com/photo/17259373

WR.

[chaptazbru]

Quizmonkey - drop dead you stupid moron !!!!