Donate SIGN UP

Yet Another Young Life Taken, For What?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 14:09 Thu 17th Jan 2013 | News
21 Answers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2263844/Kieran-Crump-Raiswell-18-stabbed-death-broad-daylight-street-execution-South-Manchester.html

It has been banded about recently about lowering the age of consent, before we consider this shouldn't they first lower the age of responsibility?

I am sure most would agree that such killers no matter how old, should when found guilty be given life sentences.

Obviously we do not yet know the age of the killer or killers of this young lad, but it matters not what age they are, the time has come for such knife killers to suffer the full consequences for their crimes.

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 21rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
As you say yourself "Obviously we do not yet know the age of the killer or killers".

So the connection between your question and the link is non-existent.
no known motive as yet, no known age of the assailant, could be a robbery gone wrong, or just a lone madman taking his fury out on whoever he happened upon. Poor boy, what another waste of a life.
The police believe the attacker was between 16 and 18 years old in this case, so lowering the age of responsibility is not relevant.
/// Lone offender armed with a knife///

///The knifeman is described as a white teenager aged between 16 and 18.///

Have you actually read your link?

As far as I'm aware the age of Criminal Tesponsibility in England and Wales is 10.

Could it be initiation?
Baldric, you're right. They changed it after the James Bulger case.
didn't see that far, so a possible 16/18 year old, well let's hope he gets caught soon.
Typo, R not T ^^^^^^^^^^^^
A person of 16 can be detained for "life" as de facto can a child of ten. The age when a child was deemed to have criminal responsibility used to be 8, so the world has obviously gone to pot ! I blame lefty liberal do-gooders
the killers of James Bulger were young, they were not detained for life, though some think they should have been. Hard to say locking up a ten year for life is the right approach, however if the age in law says they are responsible then it would be unlikely they would serve a life term.
Yes, em, a child, like Bulger was, is detained in a suitable place until such time as the authorities think it is proper to release him; it's an indeterminate "sentence".
You are clearly suggesting punishing criminals here! Don't let the Lib dems hear you!
Absolutely disgusting savage low lives why can society not deal with this sub humanity?
James Bulger was not the child who committed the crime in that case Fred, he was the 2 year old victim.
as daffy said, James Bulger was the victim, not the criminal, his injuries were so severe that even today it's hard to know what to think about the boys that did it.
Oops ! LOL. The rest was right though.
If you're caught carrying a knife, mandatory five years in prison.

To be advertised widely for six months before implementation.

Full stop.
Agree SP, and I thought Cameron was promising to clamp down on this?

What happened?
Question Author
Some of you were quick to point out that the age of responsibility has nothing to do with this case, why else does one think that I added "Obviously we do not yet know the age of the killer or killers of this young lad"?

Of course it hasn't I know that, it was just a chance I took to make a suggestion seeing that quite a few of these stabbings are done by youngsters and we witness the law handing out little more than slapped wrists and notification that the young criminal cannot be named because of his or hers age etc.
AOG

Can you please define 'slapped wrist'.

To me, a slapped wrist might be a community service order, or perhaps six months in jail.

How do you define it?
Question Author
sp1814

The words 'slapped wrist' is a popular term used for someone getting an inappropriate term of punishment, such as the creature in this case.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2263200/Damilola-Taylor-killer-Ricky-Preddie-jail-THIRD-time.html

Served just four years of an eight years sentence, for killing a Damiola Taylor, seems to fit that criteria.

Incidentally, I was going to put "for killing a fellow human being", but classing such a creature as a human being is taking things much too far.

1 to 20 of 21rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Yet Another Young Life Taken, For What?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.