News1 min ago
Retail Apartheid?
241 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mushroom25. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ./Christians in theirs etcetera/
I don't want this to be a 'Christian country'.
One lot of the blissfully delusioned are the ones most likely to pander to the others in the interests of 'inter-faith cooperation'
The sooner us without religion curb all this nonsense the sooner M&S can achieve their ideal of a 'secular environment'
I don't want this to be a 'Christian country'.
One lot of the blissfully delusioned are the ones most likely to pander to the others in the interests of 'inter-faith cooperation'
The sooner us without religion curb all this nonsense the sooner M&S can achieve their ideal of a 'secular environment'
> where did you get that idea from?
From the fact that it actually happened.
It may not be "policy" but that doesn't mean it can't happen. One mistake leads to another.
First mistake (by a manager): worker is asked to work on the grocery till (maybe because queues are long, and presumably forgetting that the worker shouldn't be asked to work there)
Second mistake (by the worker): worker agrees to work on the grocery till (presumably trying to be helpful, and hoping desperately that no customer will present pork or alcohol)
The outcome of these two mistakes, plus the "policy", is the ridiculous situation that a customer can be refused service to buy a legal product that the store chooses to sell and the customer chooses to buy.
This is an outcome of the policy. It may not BE the policy itself, but it is definitely an outcome of it.
From the fact that it actually happened.
It may not be "policy" but that doesn't mean it can't happen. One mistake leads to another.
First mistake (by a manager): worker is asked to work on the grocery till (maybe because queues are long, and presumably forgetting that the worker shouldn't be asked to work there)
Second mistake (by the worker): worker agrees to work on the grocery till (presumably trying to be helpful, and hoping desperately that no customer will present pork or alcohol)
The outcome of these two mistakes, plus the "policy", is the ridiculous situation that a customer can be refused service to buy a legal product that the store chooses to sell and the customer chooses to buy.
This is an outcome of the policy. It may not BE the policy itself, but it is definitely an outcome of it.
^^
Agreed
we have just one Muslim employee (that i know of) who we employed 8 years ago with a clear understanding his religious practices would not interfere with work.
His praying is innocuous and flexible. If he does fast at Ramadan it isn't obvious.
Above all, the one thing that bothers him is the possibility that the religious fanatics his family thought they'd left behind in Iran might follow them here!
Agreed
we have just one Muslim employee (that i know of) who we employed 8 years ago with a clear understanding his religious practices would not interfere with work.
His praying is innocuous and flexible. If he does fast at Ramadan it isn't obvious.
Above all, the one thing that bothers him is the possibility that the religious fanatics his family thought they'd left behind in Iran might follow them here!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.