News3 mins ago
Pound Stirling?
Is it reasonable for the SNP to expect that an independent Scotland could keep the pound?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ludwig. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.gromit // So why would Scotland using Sterling be a problem. Losing Scotland would damage the power of Sterling, probably hastening our conversion the the dreaded €uro. //
So presumably you concur with the SNP's view that Westminster (at least Balls and Clegg) are just saying this as a scaremongering tactic to influence the independence vote, when in reality they wouldn't be opposed to the Scots retaining sterling?
So presumably you concur with the SNP's view that Westminster (at least Balls and Clegg) are just saying this as a scaremongering tactic to influence the independence vote, when in reality they wouldn't be opposed to the Scots retaining sterling?
Gromit
/// A union or tethering two or more countries to a single currency is something that is done by agreement between all parties. While the Conservatives are in Government, it is fair to assume they will oppose it. ///
This is not a one party thing, all the main parties are in agreement over this.
/// Britain's main political parties will tell Scotland in coordinated statements in coming days it cannot keep the pound if it votes for independence ///
http:// uk.reut ers.com /articl e/2014/ 02/12/u k-brita in-scot land-os borne-i dUKBREA 1B0EQ20 140212
/// A union or tethering two or more countries to a single currency is something that is done by agreement between all parties. While the Conservatives are in Government, it is fair to assume they will oppose it. ///
This is not a one party thing, all the main parties are in agreement over this.
/// Britain's main political parties will tell Scotland in coordinated statements in coming days it cannot keep the pound if it votes for independence ///
http://
A union of countries using Sterling would not cause squabbling, it would stop it. The Bank of England would write the terms of the Agreement and an Independent Scotland would have to sign it. It would be a contract.
It would be unusual for a currency to lose a quarter of its users and be judged stronger.
If Scotland do go Independent, there will have to be agreements and collabarations on all kinds of things besides currency. The armed forces being the most prominant.
It would be unusual for a currency to lose a quarter of its users and be judged stronger.
If Scotland do go Independent, there will have to be agreements and collabarations on all kinds of things besides currency. The armed forces being the most prominant.
details here, all three parties have said the same, for once.
http:// www.the guardia n.com/p olitics /2014/f eb/12/u k-parti es-rule -out-cu rrency- union-s cotland
http://
I'll answer my own question. The Bank of England, Westminster (all parties, not just 3) have no power whatsoever in dictating to Scotland what monetary policy it will pursue or what currency it will use after independence. Scotland has chosen to retain the pound and that's all there is to it.
Scotland has also chosen to retain The Monarchy after independence and no-one can refuse that either, not even Her Majesty.
Scotland has also chosen to retain The Monarchy after independence and no-one can refuse that either, not even Her Majesty.