"Since you chose not to comment on the two links that I provided I don't see why I should, but I will, individuals posing for pictures with a guns in a country that has completely different gun laws to our own is nothing new, and we are not likely to set on such individuals as magistrates to rule in our courts"
This is just a big old LoL. I have commentated on your links, haven't I? At least by inference, if not by anything else.
And it seems you believe that the colour of this mans skin coupled with the pose with AK 47 renders him unsuitable for the post of magistrate simply because it "fits everyones image of a terrorist". So it is perfectly OK now to judge someone purely on their appearance?
As for my link - it is a picture of Senator Gabbie Giffords, from the US - a nice lady shot in the head whilst out canvassing. The country she is from is immaterial. If shown the photo alone, without knowing the individual concerned, you could have no idea which country she was a citizen of.
To me, this seems a non-story promoted to media attention by virtue of the colour of the mans skin, which automatically makes him a terrorist suspect.
I think that pretty sad, to be honest.