LazyGun - "I can only speak from personal experience here, but I know 2 judges sort of socially, both of whom shoot regularly - clay pidgeons and hunting mostly, but one attends a firing range too - and both have probably got photographs of them with a gun in hand. Are you saying that neither of these guys should be considered suitable material for being a...
Who knows, he might have been about to go tiger hunting. You'll remember the Tory, Willie Whitelaw, shot a beater on some grouse moor. Nobody called for him to be fired.
Personally I use guns fairly regularly, but I fail to see the attraction at all in being photographed holding a gun of any description, so I cannot understand quite why this guy felt the need to be photographed holding one - but why should it create such a furore?
LG, it creates a furore because he is a man with a non-white skin and a beard and is therefore probably a terrorist. Shariah law for Britain is just around the corner, as you know.
/// it creates a furore because he is a man with a non-white skin and a beard and is therefore probably a terrorist. Shariah law for Britain is just around the corner, as you know. ///
/// Images of Farage with a gun would be very disturbing because, in the minds of some, he seems the sort of man who might one day go on a shooting spree ///
You may disagree with his politics but that is a shocking thing to say, I only hope for you that his lawyers don't see what you have put.
A councillor cannot be fired, but his party can de-select him and the voters can not vote for him. I doubt he would lose his 'job' as a magistrate over a photo taken in another country.
But why would his party de-select him? The weapon wasn't his. It was not in this country. Was not illegal as far as we know. It was not fired or used illegally.
Not sure it is the right image for the LibDems though. More suited to Vladamir Putin's Party.
"I bet it would have if it had been Nigel Farage posing in such a way."
Why? You still have not explained why you think any media furore over this picture is warranted, nor what is so disturbing about it.
Like I say, some wannabee politician holding a gun would not persuade me to vote for them, so I think it more a symptom of juvenile macho- ness more than anything else - but why is it a "firing" offence?
I can only speak from personal experience here, but I know 2 judges sort of socially, both of whom shoot regularly - clay pidgeons and hunting mostly, but one attends a firing range too - and both have probably got photographs of them with a gun in hand. Are you saying that neither of these guys should be considered suitable material for being a magistrate?
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.