ChatterBank0 min ago
Some Good News For A Change
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The whole article is written in code. I have managed to de-cypher it...
finish its contract early
= Fired.
significant quality failures
= They couldn't do the job.
a new company would be appointed in early 2015
= we haven't learnt the lesson and we will repeat the mistake again.
[I] the settlement was "in the best interests of all parties". [I]
= it would be embarrassing to admit the private sector f*cked us over, so we are not going to sue them for not fulfilling their contract.
[I] "We will be transferring our infrastructure and employees to ensure consistency of service to those going through the process. [I]
= Nothing really changes except the name, the service will continue to be consistently bad.
Atos said it was seeking to end its government contract
= We've been rumbled, let's scarper.
the Department for Work and Pensions...put a plan for improvement in place.
= Were fed up of all the complaints and decided to sack Atos.
the DWP said standards had declined unacceptably.
= Atos knew they were going so stopped spending any of the contract money delivering the service.
the government was looking for a provider to replace Atos
= Has anyone got Serco's phone number?
Atos will not receive a single penny of compensation
= Atos made a ton of money out of us for two years which was good while it lasted.
Atos has made a substantial financial settlement to the department.
= they have paid back the money we gave up front for work which will now not be done by them.
[I] "We are pleased the government have allowed us to exit this contract early and we remain committed to delivering essential services to the UK government as a strategic supplier." [I]
= Thanks for all the money, we look forward to more contracts when we have renamed and the flak has died down.
finish its contract early
= Fired.
significant quality failures
= They couldn't do the job.
a new company would be appointed in early 2015
= we haven't learnt the lesson and we will repeat the mistake again.
[I] the settlement was "in the best interests of all parties". [I]
= it would be embarrassing to admit the private sector f*cked us over, so we are not going to sue them for not fulfilling their contract.
[I] "We will be transferring our infrastructure and employees to ensure consistency of service to those going through the process. [I]
= Nothing really changes except the name, the service will continue to be consistently bad.
Atos said it was seeking to end its government contract
= We've been rumbled, let's scarper.
the Department for Work and Pensions...put a plan for improvement in place.
= Were fed up of all the complaints and decided to sack Atos.
the DWP said standards had declined unacceptably.
= Atos knew they were going so stopped spending any of the contract money delivering the service.
the government was looking for a provider to replace Atos
= Has anyone got Serco's phone number?
Atos will not receive a single penny of compensation
= Atos made a ton of money out of us for two years which was good while it lasted.
Atos has made a substantial financial settlement to the department.
= they have paid back the money we gave up front for work which will now not be done by them.
[I] "We are pleased the government have allowed us to exit this contract early and we remain committed to delivering essential services to the UK government as a strategic supplier." [I]
= Thanks for all the money, we look forward to more contracts when we have renamed and the flak has died down.
Latest Posts
ChatterBank3 mins ago
Death Of Three Young Ladies Backpacking...
News11 mins ago
News14 mins ago
ChatterBank21 mins ago
