Shopping & Style0 min ago
Breaking News
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sherrardk. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Indeed they will - and that's not a bad thing. I just feel that to be judged by today's standards on what might have been acceptable years ago is harsh. I can't help thinking that if the great train robbers had committed a similar crime today their sentences would have been very different. Times change - but Operation Yewtree doesn't appear to acknowledge that.
you can't be charged with committing a crime if it wasn't a crime when you did it. And it looks as if his sentence won't be much out of line with anything he'd have got 20 years ago. So in effect he's had all that time to live as a respectable and influential citizen and make money, which mightn't have happened had he been charged at the time.
I'm shedding no tears over him; he isn't the one who's been abused.
I'm shedding no tears over him; he isn't the one who's been abused.
Castration doesn't work with all rapists, Ron. I would argue that for most it is not an irrepressible sexual urge that causes them to offend, it is the desire to dominate, intimidate and degrade the victim, often there is a rage behind it.
If the rapist is castrated it won't stop him using tools to carry out acts of degradation.
If the rapist is castrated it won't stop him using tools to carry out acts of degradation.