ChatterBank1 min ago
Would You Stand By A Rapist Husband?
102 Answers
http://
I ask our female ABers, would you have as understanding as this woman if your partner/ husband had behaved in such a way?
I ask our female ABers, would you have as understanding as this woman if your partner/ husband had behaved in such a way?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
andy-hughes
/// Indeed it can AOG, and there is little doubt that the Mail is underlining its disbelief that a Cambridge gel could stand by a thug like this, plus he is an immigrant, and he's b..... bl....., no I am spluttering too much to type it! ///
/// Ticks all the Mail's boxes though! ///
And you don't think this would happen if the thug happened to be white, a celebrity, a benefit cheater, from whatever country etc, etc?
Black immigrants don't own the sole rights of widespread coverage from the Daily Mail.
The Mail reports on the crimes not just the perpetrator, would you be pleased to see such cases not reported on?
Incidentally Andy you missed out 'ugly' in your descriptions of the drug taking, adulterous, sexual assaulter rapist.
http://
/// Indeed it can AOG, and there is little doubt that the Mail is underlining its disbelief that a Cambridge gel could stand by a thug like this, plus he is an immigrant, and he's b..... bl....., no I am spluttering too much to type it! ///
/// Ticks all the Mail's boxes though! ///
And you don't think this would happen if the thug happened to be white, a celebrity, a benefit cheater, from whatever country etc, etc?
Black immigrants don't own the sole rights of widespread coverage from the Daily Mail.
The Mail reports on the crimes not just the perpetrator, would you be pleased to see such cases not reported on?
Incidentally Andy you missed out 'ugly' in your descriptions of the drug taking, adulterous, sexual assaulter rapist.
http://
AOG - "Black immigrants don't own the sole rights of widespread coverage from the Daily Mail."
Actually, i think they do!
"Incidentally Andy you missed out 'ugly' in your descriptions of the drug taking, adulterous, sexual assaulter rapist."
That's a subjective judgement which I do not feel qualified to make, but thanks for your input - I guess we can go with that.
Actually, i think they do!
"Incidentally Andy you missed out 'ugly' in your descriptions of the drug taking, adulterous, sexual assaulter rapist."
That's a subjective judgement which I do not feel qualified to make, but thanks for your input - I guess we can go with that.
andy-hughes
/// AOG - "Black immigrants don't own the sole rights of widespread coverage from the Daily Mail." ///
/// Actually, i think they do! ///
You may 'THINK' so, but that does not make what you assume to be correct.
But if it is myself who happens to be wrong, then I would be more than willing to concede.
That said I only hope there isn't a sudden escalation in knife crime etc..
/// AOG - "Black immigrants don't own the sole rights of widespread coverage from the Daily Mail." ///
/// Actually, i think they do! ///
You may 'THINK' so, but that does not make what you assume to be correct.
But if it is myself who happens to be wrong, then I would be more than willing to concede.
That said I only hope there isn't a sudden escalation in knife crime etc..
jim360
/// You make yourself look daft by spending time in a serious thread fussing over the semantics of the word "look". Honestly. ///
That should of course be "You leave yourself open to being called daft"
I am myself a regular target for the resident AB semantic investigators, so I thought for a change I myself would get one in, so as to save them all that trouble you know?
But I didn't realise that they were 'DAFT LOOKING' I just thought that they were just insistent on the correct terminology.
Just shows how wrong one can be.
/// You make yourself look daft by spending time in a serious thread fussing over the semantics of the word "look". Honestly. ///
That should of course be "You leave yourself open to being called daft"
I am myself a regular target for the resident AB semantic investigators, so I thought for a change I myself would get one in, so as to save them all that trouble you know?
But I didn't realise that they were 'DAFT LOOKING' I just thought that they were just insistent on the correct terminology.
Just shows how wrong one can be.
AOG - "/// AOG - "Black immigrants don't own the sole rights of widespread coverage from the Daily Mail." ///
/// Actually, i think they do! ///
You may 'THINK' so, but that does not make what you assume to be correct.
But if it is myself who happens to be wrong, then I would be more than willing to concede."
Your defence of your news media of choice is admirable, but as daily readers and analysts of repute, I think we both know that my point is a valid one.
/// Actually, i think they do! ///
You may 'THINK' so, but that does not make what you assume to be correct.
But if it is myself who happens to be wrong, then I would be more than willing to concede."
Your defence of your news media of choice is admirable, but as daily readers and analysts of repute, I think we both know that my point is a valid one.
/leave yourself open to being called daft/
you may not realise it, but you can't be 'called daft' aog because on this forum we can't speak to or hear each other.
if you want to discuss semantics perhaps you should consider that, and acknowledge that though we only interact in writing, we use language from other Representation Systems (visual, auditory etc) to express ourselves.
I hope you can SEE my point, HEAR what I'm SAYING and that it MAKES SENSE.
you may not realise it, but you can't be 'called daft' aog because on this forum we can't speak to or hear each other.
if you want to discuss semantics perhaps you should consider that, and acknowledge that though we only interact in writing, we use language from other Representation Systems (visual, auditory etc) to express ourselves.
I hope you can SEE my point, HEAR what I'm SAYING and that it MAKES SENSE.
In terms of the original question, it's often the case that people in love bend over backwards to hide from the crimes/ faults of those they do love. Sometimes you don't even need love to be so irrational. Simply being a victim, but able to convince yourself that somehow it was your fault is enough: "I shouldn't have been there at the time", "If I'd spent more time with him then he wouldn't be this way", "I could have done a better job defending myself", etc.
I can sympathise then, to some extent, with this woman's attitude. I don't know what I'd be like in the same or a similar situation. I hope that I never have to find out.
I can sympathise then, to some extent, with this woman's attitude. I don't know what I'd be like in the same or a similar situation. I hope that I never have to find out.
pixie373
/// Aog, sp said "i could"..not necessarily "i would" ///
And I am criticised for making myself look daft for fussing over semantics.
Just to refresh this is what sp put.
*** Here's the thing...could you stand by your partner, if they had been convicted of murder? ***
*** I could. ***
I could, I would, ????
In the context in which it was said, it has exactly the same meaning.
/// Aog, sp said "i could"..not necessarily "i would" ///
And I am criticised for making myself look daft for fussing over semantics.
Just to refresh this is what sp put.
*** Here's the thing...could you stand by your partner, if they had been convicted of murder? ***
*** I could. ***
I could, I would, ????
In the context in which it was said, it has exactly the same meaning.
ummmm
/// I can't answer for SP but as far as I'm concerned he's saying that rape is somehow worse than murder. That of course would depend on the murder so not child killers etc. You knew that anyway so I'm wasting my time typing. ///
Unlike yourself who seems to be able to read sp's mind, I can only go on what he put, and he didn't categorise which murders, only murders.
/// I can't answer for SP but as far as I'm concerned he's saying that rape is somehow worse than murder. That of course would depend on the murder so not child killers etc. You knew that anyway so I'm wasting my time typing. ///
Unlike yourself who seems to be able to read sp's mind, I can only go on what he put, and he didn't categorise which murders, only murders.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.