Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Women In Men Out
18 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Ah...The Worm That Turned.
Very good.
I would suggest that it's not so much 'men out women in'...it looks to be more 'old guard out new blood in'.
The Conservatives and made great strides to look for talented young ministers who don't necessarily stand peeing up. These women will have to prove themselves as much as (say) Theresa May, whom I have a lot of respect for.
If they fail, they will be out.
Very good.
I would suggest that it's not so much 'men out women in'...it looks to be more 'old guard out new blood in'.
The Conservatives and made great strides to look for talented young ministers who don't necessarily stand peeing up. These women will have to prove themselves as much as (say) Theresa May, whom I have a lot of respect for.
If they fail, they will be out.
It has always seemed to be that women in politics have to look like they fell out the ugly tree and hit every branch on the way down and have a face like a bulldog chewing a wasp.
There is no reason for that so lets hope this heralds change there too.
I see no reason to knck the promotion of women. As more get into politics then the % should change. Whether they are the right women (as with the men promoted) time will tell.
I wonder what Milliband will do now? Cleegy doesn't have to bother of course!
There is no reason for that so lets hope this heralds change there too.
I see no reason to knck the promotion of women. As more get into politics then the % should change. Whether they are the right women (as with the men promoted) time will tell.
I wonder what Milliband will do now? Cleegy doesn't have to bother of course!
A little unfair to comment on the relative attractiveness of female politicians when our make MPs are so comprehensively grim.
And another thing - we all say that ministers should be chosen for their ability rather than to tick boxes.
But why isn't this ever said when male ministers are chosen?
Why is it that when a man fails, no-one ever comments on him being promoted above his ability? His sex is irrelevant...but if a woman minister fails, the usual suspects will immediately tie it to her being a woman..."Well, that's the result of positive discrimination".
Has Nick Clegg done an amazing job?
What about David Cameron? Ed Balls? George Osborne? Ed Milliband?
Are these all political titans?
If not - then what kind of positive discrimination can be blamed for them occupying high office?
And another thing - we all say that ministers should be chosen for their ability rather than to tick boxes.
But why isn't this ever said when male ministers are chosen?
Why is it that when a man fails, no-one ever comments on him being promoted above his ability? His sex is irrelevant...but if a woman minister fails, the usual suspects will immediately tie it to her being a woman..."Well, that's the result of positive discrimination".
Has Nick Clegg done an amazing job?
What about David Cameron? Ed Balls? George Osborne? Ed Milliband?
Are these all political titans?
If not - then what kind of positive discrimination can be blamed for them occupying high office?