Yes. There are facilities here to treat this UK citizen. The USA and Spain have already returned people infected with Ebola to their homeland. Could we do less?
If they're here it seems only common sense to treat them as in doing so we're protecting ourselves. I can't see us going out to West Africa looking to treat victims of this dreadful disease. More's the pity.
^ but the same could apply to a lot of countries. If we start arguing who should be responsible for treating we could have delays and a worse problem...
"How long will it be before we are treating those from other countries, because they haven't the resources to deal with the problem?"
I think that you might be worrying unnecessarily.
Did we fly those who were suffering from SARS or Swine Flu to the UK, or did the WHO instead organise experts to fly out to affected regions and assist locally?
Don't you think that this is more the more likely solution, in the case of Ebola?
In the olden days the time it took to complete a journey acted as a sort of quarantine. An Ebola carrier setting sail from some port on the west African coast would be dead and buried at sea long before the boat docked in the UK. Now a victim could board a plane in the morning and be here at Heathrow infecting innocent indigenous people by the afternoon.
We should ban all air travel until this clears up.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.