I have just created my Dedicated Follower of Fashion awards , and have chosen this thread to honour its first recipients. That's because there are a lot of contestants , some of whom have an excellent pedigree.
Firstly, I offer my commiserations to the also rans, that is all of you who described the OAP's obscene remarks variously as:
Silly/Careless/Stupid and rude/Racist/Offensive.
You're not trying hard enough, are you? Reading the Guardian and watching Question Time will help, as will joining the Lib Dems. Helpful reading material is George Orwell's 1984, and (for the more bookish) Karl Popper's The Open Society and its Enemies, both of which contain useful ideas.
Now, the three winners in reverse order.
In joint third place I put the two voices of moderation (as I'm sure they view themselves) who suggested giving him a good talking and sending him to the back of the queue. You haven't yet fully grasped the dangers posed to society by people such as this OAP, and the need for a civilised society to (not just disapprove of, but) criminalise the abuse of the right to free speech.
In second place and a worthy runner-up is the poster who produced these two delights:
"Older people simply lose the ability to employ that discretion filter that we use daily to prevent what goes through our minds from coming out of our minds simultaniously." "Could there be an element of dimentia involved here? maybe undiagnosed, but still present - and maybe an allowance could be made". This is just the tone of voice we need to adopt when dealing with ignorant bigots, simulating concern for the sinner, while at the same time asserting our own righteousness. Much like the priest soliciting repentance at the auto-da-fe.
But no doubt about this thread's winner. It's the author of this elegant and cogently argued dismissal of so-called free speech which he described as:
"an over-rated practice. Especially when people like the gentleman in this story display the meagre contents of their mind."