News2 mins ago
Britain First - Paul Golding
455 Answers
Appears at court today but what of the charges he faces? The 'uniform' charge is bizarre to say the least. Short video in the link where Golding outlines the situation.
https:/ /www.br itainfi rst.org /video- britain -first- leader- paul-go lding-s peaks-e ssex-co urt-tod ay/
https:/
Answers
mikey, the mosque is being built on a car park adjacent to the station, which is a key commuting point for workers in London. as well as the loss of that facility, the local council has arranged a deal with the train company for the mosque to block-buy nearly 80 spaces in their own car park. thus aside from the disruption of the building work itself, the resultant...
10:57 Sun 09th Nov 2014
And as we opine.......:
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -299550 66
But obviously they're innocent until proven guilty, only 'allegations' at the moment, I must stress.
Smoke? Fire? Who said that?
http://
But obviously they're innocent until proven guilty, only 'allegations' at the moment, I must stress.
Smoke? Fire? Who said that?
ichkeria...well said at 13:27 but you can take a horse to water but you can't make it drink. Some peoples irrational hatred of other non-white people can cloud their ability to see common sense.
We have a lovely new Post Office in my village, which is owned and operated by some Hindu people. I heard one of the village loudmouths complaining, in our local Cafe, that "P***s" were taking over the place"
(This chap normally complains about "Poles coming over to Wales to take our jobs despite nobody recalling any job that he has had in at least 25 years)
I pointed out that the Post Office people couldn't possibly be P***s as they were Hindus. This took some explaining, as he must have been off school the day that they did Geography. But he then shouted out that it didn't matter
what f*****g religion they were, as they were still black and he hated Black People"
Naked racism, red in tooth and claw !
We have a lovely new Post Office in my village, which is owned and operated by some Hindu people. I heard one of the village loudmouths complaining, in our local Cafe, that "P***s" were taking over the place"
(This chap normally complains about "Poles coming over to Wales to take our jobs despite nobody recalling any job that he has had in at least 25 years)
I pointed out that the Post Office people couldn't possibly be P***s as they were Hindus. This took some explaining, as he must have been off school the day that they did Geography. But he then shouted out that it didn't matter
what f*****g religion they were, as they were still black and he hated Black People"
Naked racism, red in tooth and claw !
ChillDoubt - that's an example of the law in action. It shows that we don't need the likes of Golding meting out his own justice. If he has evidence then he should take it to the authorities - who possibly have more evidence of their own - and let them deal with it. He does not have the right to take the law into his own hands. That is more the action of the terrorists he claims to despise ...
ChillDoubt - "And as we opine.......:
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -299550 66
But obviously they're innocent until proven guilty, only 'allegations' at the moment, I must stress.
Smoke? Fire? Who said that?"
I am not sure of the point you are making.
These men have been arrested, and wil pssibly face trial, and then possibly face conviction - that is due process of law.
The same law that protects your rights if you were arrested on suspicion of a crime - you wouldn't want your rights infringed, would you?
http://
But obviously they're innocent until proven guilty, only 'allegations' at the moment, I must stress.
Smoke? Fire? Who said that?"
I am not sure of the point you are making.
These men have been arrested, and wil pssibly face trial, and then possibly face conviction - that is due process of law.
The same law that protects your rights if you were arrested on suspicion of a crime - you wouldn't want your rights infringed, would you?
Chill, as Naomi has stated, the need to protect the public is paramount.
-------------------
You and I know that agchristie. The landscape has changed over the last 2 decades, whereby the rights of the individual MUST at times take second place when it comes to preserving democracy and preventing terrorism. The foil hat brigade will always lean towards the indivivual though and hang the consequences.
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -299391 92
-------------------
You and I know that agchristie. The landscape has changed over the last 2 decades, whereby the rights of the individual MUST at times take second place when it comes to preserving democracy and preventing terrorism. The foil hat brigade will always lean towards the indivivual though and hang the consequences.
http://
The same law that protects your rights if you were arrested on suspicion of a crime - you wouldn't want your rights infringed, would you?
----------------------
Indeed not, but then I wouldn't place myself in that position i.e. becoming involved in clandestine and covert behaviour that would be seen to be endangering the lives of others in the name of 'religion'.
----------------------
Indeed not, but then I wouldn't place myself in that position i.e. becoming involved in clandestine and covert behaviour that would be seen to be endangering the lives of others in the name of 'religion'.
Mikey, // We don't want these huge mosques with domes and minarets in our towns with separate entrances for men and women in our country."
Sounds like racism to me ! //
'Racists' decrying misogyny. Are they wrong?
Phew, that post could be used in the next COED as an example under the entry for "disingenuous "!!
If that is a case of championing women's rights then, well, I'd be surprised (he finished lamely ... :-) )
Sounds like racism to me ! //
'Racists' decrying misogyny. Are they wrong?
Phew, that post could be used in the next COED as an example under the entry for "disingenuous "!!
If that is a case of championing women's rights then, well, I'd be surprised (he finished lamely ... :-) )
naomi24..do you really think that BF is campaigning against this new Mosque because men and women will have different entrances ?
Really ?
There are Golf Clubs that still won't admit women but there is a distinct lack of BF demonstrations, with their placards outside these Clubs. However, if we ever had a Golf Club that only admitted Muslim players, it would be entirely different.
I am against misogyny, as you well know but it isn't sufficient reason to not want a Mosque to be built. The Catholic Church doesn't have women Parish Priests but it not an excuse for a new Church not to be built is it ?
Race is the issue here not sex, and I am surprised that you have been taken in by BF.
Really ?
There are Golf Clubs that still won't admit women but there is a distinct lack of BF demonstrations, with their placards outside these Clubs. However, if we ever had a Golf Club that only admitted Muslim players, it would be entirely different.
I am against misogyny, as you well know but it isn't sufficient reason to not want a Mosque to be built. The Catholic Church doesn't have women Parish Priests but it not an excuse for a new Church not to be built is it ?
Race is the issue here not sex, and I am surprised that you have been taken in by BF.
'Being seen' to be doing anything is not a crime
------------------------
Erm........if they're 'being seen' to be plotting or preparing acts of terror, that's fairly criminal behaviour from where I'm standing. Again andy, you need to remove those pinky-lensed spectacles and take a look around at what's happening in the real world from time to time, you spend too much time around 'rock stars'.
------------------------
Erm........if they're 'being seen' to be plotting or preparing acts of terror, that's fairly criminal behaviour from where I'm standing. Again andy, you need to remove those pinky-lensed spectacles and take a look around at what's happening in the real world from time to time, you spend too much time around 'rock stars'.