Britain First - Paul Golding

[agchristie]

Appears at court today but what of the charges he faces? The 'uniform' charge is bizarre to say the least. Short video in the link where Golding outlines the situation.

https://www.britainfirst.org/video-britain-first-leader-paul-golding-speaks-essex-court-today/

[agchristie]

Mikey, I was asked to clarify four questions, I gave answers to which Zacs stated yesterday at 22.46

///It has served the purpose of me being able to accurately judge your opinions more accurately so thanks again///.

Then, all of a sudden, some answers were deemed deficient. Anyway, the thread is not about my leanings.

As I said.how people interpret my answers is up to them but Mikey, proceed with caution as you may fall off the bandwagon!

[mikey4444]

agchristie...I only meant my comment as a helpful hint, and I had no intention of causing any distress to you in so doing.

But I would implore you to fully investigate BF...there are plenty of resources here on the Web. The comment made last night by Diane Abbot in "Any Questions" regarding UKIP can equally apply to BF...."if you lie down with dogs, you run a real risk of getting infested with fleas "

[BlackadderV]

I have a feeling that the Labour bandwagon will grind to a halt long before Mikey has a chance to fall off it.

[mikey4444]

Blackadder...not sure what on earth your comment has to do with the topic in question ?

[BlackadderV]

See the last sentence of ag's post @8.08

[mikey4444]

What "bandwagon" ? This thread is about Golding and Britain First, not the Labour Party.

[agchristie]

Mikey, I took your first sentence literally in that you agreed with Zacs and DB.

UKIP and BF are not a million miles apart on some key issues. However much people may be dismayed by that they need to wise up because the big two do need to get their acts together fast because the Ukip train is relentless at present.

[agchristie]

Blackadder, I did use the word 'bandwagon' because nobody mentioned that I may have any allegiance to BF until 150 posts in, then one questionned it and that soon became three...

[Zacs-Master]

I actually agree with you there Ag. I have said many times on here, that UKIP have far right tendencies which, at the moment, they are hiding for the sake of votes. Spoke people seem to think that they've cleaned up their act. They haven't, they've just swept their less popular ideologies under the carpet for the moment.

[agchristie]

Zacs, it will be interesting to see how many gains UKIP make next May.

The one big difference between them and BF is on the subject of Islam which Ukip wont touch with a bargepole.

[mikey4444]

agchristie...there is a wealth of difference between UKIP and Fascist organisations like BF, I can assure you.

[agchristie]

Not on the big two issues for the electorate Mikey, EU membership and immigration. These issues will be main reasons for voting for them or am I wrong?

[agchristie]

Coming back to the Rochester by-election and the Royal Mail's decision not to deliver it to 50,000 homes, is a disgrace and unlawful.

The BF leadership have confirmed that it would cost in excess of 10k to obtain an Injunction in the High Court. A barrister and two legal firms have stated that BF would be virtually guaranteed to win the case but BF have decided that time is running out as the leaflets would need to be printed etc by Monday and there simply aren't the funds to use in this way.

This is democracy at it's worst but it has backfired as millions have viewed the leaflet online.

[Zacs-Master]

Is it more or less of a disgrace than the BF people (I refuse to use the word 'party') putting 'Remember Lee Rigby' on European election voting forms?

[mikey4444]

It appears that you have still not cottoned to the real BF agchristie. Royal Mail will have taken advice on this issue. The fact that BF can't seem to find the money to challenge it is immaterial. And I doubt if many people will have seen this leaflet.

[ichkeria]

Here it is ...

http://www.britainfirst.net/rochester-leaflet.pdf


Reminds me of a party election broadcast the BNP were allowed to do a few years ago.
Not as scary as the picture of Jayda Fransen I've just been looking at: looks like she's taking part in a Grim Reaper karaoke :-)
Anyway, my message to the good folk of Rochester is:
Vote BF, get the Tories
Vote Monster Raving Loony, get UKIP :-)

[agchristie]

Zacs, the Electoral Commission approved the leaflet you are referring to and the watchdog had to issue a grovelling apology when it realised after the event that permission should have been refused.

Mikey, you are missing the point here. BF have the money to challenge it but the decision has been made to use the resources elsewhere and not on a hefty legal bill, there are time pressures too. Like I said, millions have now seen it online instead due to all the publicity.

[Zacs-Master]

So you think it was ok to put that phrase on the form?

[agchristie]

Zacs, I have not said it was ok, I said that the EC approved it and realised the error belatedly.

[anotheoldgit]

What amazes me is the fact that posters such as mikey, seemed to be more frightened by these Far-Right political groups, than the ones that have proven in the past to have done us very much bodily harm and continue to do so at the present time.

But for some strange reason they don't seem to go at these savage murderers with the same vigour show to those groups who they call "Fascists", "Nazis" "Racists", "Knuckle Draggers", "Drunken Rabble", "Rabble Rousers" Etc, Etc. and then to go on and say such things as "We ignore people like this at our peril".

Anyone explain this very strange phenomenon?