ChatterBank19 mins ago
Should Fifty Shades Of Grey Be Condemned Rather Than Praised?
73 Answers
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/w omen/se x/11402 586/Thr ee-reas ons-wom en-have -to-wat ch-Fift y-Shade s-of-Gr ey.html
Here is described as a 'Chick Flick' Why??????????
I have not read the book or had any wish to see the film, but what is all this hype surrounding 'Fifty Shades of Grey'?
As far as I can see it is nothing more than a mild form of porn, which is now showing to be such a problem amongst our young.
Here is described as a 'Chick Flick' Why??????????
I have not read the book or had any wish to see the film, but what is all this hype surrounding 'Fifty Shades of Grey'?
As far as I can see it is nothing more than a mild form of porn, which is now showing to be such a problem amongst our young.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I don't really know what the question is here? I gave up on the book very early on but millions did read it and I daresay enjoy it otherwise why did she write 2 more? A colleague forgot to pick her kids up from so school she was so engrossed. It's easy to say it was a load of crap, much harder to admit you enjoyed it. It was just a 'beach' read and yes what I would call chick-lit.
Every few weeks a new 'hype' arrives, be it a book, film, pop song, whatever, and the media goes mad over it, and a section of the public will follow.
The level of hype, and the level of success are absolutely no indication of the worth or value of the hyped subject, and once again this is the case.
It will run for a few weeks, die down and be superceded, and then forgotten.
Remember The Da Vinci Code? A lousy clunker with a silly story made into an indifferent film and hyped to be the greatest thing since Shakespere.
This is simply more of the same, with the added titillation that some sex is involved.
Critically the film has bombed, which means nothing in terms of public reception to book or film.
Should it be condemned? In terms of what? Lousy writing and filming? Probably - not read or seen so can't say.
In terms of pornography - no, this is nothing like what anyone watches on the internet - no-one goes to a public cinema to watch pornography these days.
So let it roll on, and rapidly into obscurity where it probably belongs - I just wish I had written the books - the money must be awesome!
The level of hype, and the level of success are absolutely no indication of the worth or value of the hyped subject, and once again this is the case.
It will run for a few weeks, die down and be superceded, and then forgotten.
Remember The Da Vinci Code? A lousy clunker with a silly story made into an indifferent film and hyped to be the greatest thing since Shakespere.
This is simply more of the same, with the added titillation that some sex is involved.
Critically the film has bombed, which means nothing in terms of public reception to book or film.
Should it be condemned? In terms of what? Lousy writing and filming? Probably - not read or seen so can't say.
In terms of pornography - no, this is nothing like what anyone watches on the internet - no-one goes to a public cinema to watch pornography these days.
So let it roll on, and rapidly into obscurity where it probably belongs - I just wish I had written the books - the money must be awesome!
I started to read it only because my daughter put it on my kindle when I bought it. I found it utter rubbish and gave up after the girl kept saying "Oh my!" far too often! I usually refer to it a Fifty Shades of Soft Porn - definitely not chick-lit! Must admit I do find Jamie Dornan attractive but not in the trailers for the film.
one thing is for certain, it's making the author an awful lot of money. I heard the actor who portrays Grey has signed up to do the other 2 films in the trilogy and he'll make about 50 million in total (don't know if thats pounds or dollars) so if the actor is making that amount of money, what on earth is the author raking in?
Funny I expected a more protesting response from our female ABers such as those shown in these three newspaper links.
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /arts-e ntertai nment/f ilms/fi fty-sha des-of- grey-lo ndon-fi lm-prem iere-pi cketed- by-prot esters- 1004343 8.html
http:// www.the guardia n.com/f ilm/201 5/feb/1 3/fifty -shades -of-gre y-domes tic-abu se-camp aigners -protes t-londo n-premi ere
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/f email/a rticle- 2950405 /The-wo men-say -Fifty- Shades- glamori ses-dom estic-v iolence -plan-p rotest- film-s- UK-prem iere-to day.htm l
http://
http://
http://
one of the reasons it became popular was that it wasn't originally a book as such, it was fan-fiction based on the characters in Twilight; the author then put it on her own website, and finally got a book-publishing deal. So it's partly to do with growing hype and a breakthrough in self-publishing, which made it newswrothy. Normally I imagine it would be very much a niche product.
I read book one because all my friends were reading it - they offered to lend me the other two but I was terminally bored by the end. No way would I see the film - and the reviews of it, and the fact that it's got a teen licence, confirm that it's not pornographic. There's more sexual vibrancy for the young in something like Dirty Dancing!
Well now for those amongst us who would enjoy being handcuffed to a bed and blindfolded.To be spanked and have your 'inner goddess' (yuk)tickled and have hot steamy breath flow all over you. All this and more by a man who, doesn't like to be touched(problems in his youth) then this could be just the film for you! Personally I much preferred the romance and anticipation of courtship in the fifties .
Typical of protestors, to hear, third hand, that the book is about BDSM and, via some unfathomable leap of logic, link that to a phrase which the rest of the planet understands to mean "wife beating".
Either that or they're using psychic powers to review the film's content before it's actually been screened.
ps There's a Father Ted episode to go with this situation. I do sometimes get blank stares when I quote from it but…
"Down with this sort o' thing"
"Careful now"
(on placards)
Either that or they're using psychic powers to review the film's content before it's actually been screened.
ps There's a Father Ted episode to go with this situation. I do sometimes get blank stares when I quote from it but…
"Down with this sort o' thing"
"Careful now"
(on placards)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.