Crosswords3 mins ago
Absolutely Anything.
Should Smith be sacked along with the rest of the DWP liars who made up these fantasy stories?
Should they be the one's now being sanctioned instead of job seekers?
http://
Should they be the one's now being sanctioned instead of job seekers?
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Just-Jude. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
How are they lying? From the two examples I have read, one seems to say,' I didn't realise that if I didn't have a CV I could lose some benefit. I know now'.
The other seems to say, 'If I can't attend a meeting because I have a hospital appointment I should get in touch and rearrange a time so that I don't lose any money.'
Where is the deceit in that?
The other seems to say, 'If I can't attend a meeting because I have a hospital appointment I should get in touch and rearrange a time so that I don't lose any money.'
Where is the deceit in that?
-- answer removed --
divebuddy - "So what this boils down to is that the evil Tories have produced a leaflet that will help people to avoid being sanctioned."
No, this boils down to the government flouting Advertising Standards Agency regulations, which it is supposed to oversee, not ignore, and then trying to shift the blame which should be taken by the government minister, and elected MP who is supposed to be in charge.
He failed to accept responsibility, and dropped it onto his Director of Communications, also paid for by tax payers’ money, who denies all knowledge, making him paid by us to be incompetent and not know what his organisation is doing, or a liar, which is even worse!
"Right."
No, wrong!
No, this boils down to the government flouting Advertising Standards Agency regulations, which it is supposed to oversee, not ignore, and then trying to shift the blame which should be taken by the government minister, and elected MP who is supposed to be in charge.
He failed to accept responsibility, and dropped it onto his Director of Communications, also paid for by tax payers’ money, who denies all knowledge, making him paid by us to be incompetent and not know what his organisation is doing, or a liar, which is even worse!
"Right."
No, wrong!
-- answer removed --
divebuddy - please see here -
https:/
The Agency is not a legally binding body, but you would think that important organisations would want to be seen to be adhering to codes of practice that prevent misleading the public.
When I say ‘important organisations’ I mean people like … the government, you know, that sort of important.
https:/
The Agency is not a legally binding body, but you would think that important organisations would want to be seen to be adhering to codes of practice that prevent misleading the public.
When I say ‘important organisations’ I mean people like … the government, you know, that sort of important.
Jackdaw - " I have been trying to convey the self-same message but fear that the rampant hatred of the government in some quarters precludes any regard for objectivity."
I don’t hate the government, I just hate people that I have to pay money to finance lying to me, and then trying to get away with not admitting their responsibility.
People like the government, but the rule applies to anyone, I just hate being lied to.
I don’t hate the government, I just hate people that I have to pay money to finance lying to me, and then trying to get away with not admitting their responsibility.
People like the government, but the rule applies to anyone, I just hate being lied to.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
