Crosswords2 mins ago
What Do You Think?
Answers
Perhaps saying "All we need is love" is why John Lennon was shot.
21:35 Sun 23rd Aug 2015
youngmafbog - "Ah I see Hughes is off on one again, how dare you all question his writings."
First things first - I haven't been referred to as 'Hughes' since I left school, and that was over forty years ago, and I don't intend to start now - "Andy" if you want to be friendly, "Mr Hughes" if you want to be formal, "andy-hughes" to use my AB name, and "Hughes" not at all.
Thanks.
This woman is dangerous, allowing her back into our midst would be stupid beyond belief. She simply cannot be trusted."
How do you know that?
" She made her bed, now she should lie in it, well the remnants of it. "
Back to what I said about allowing people to make mistakes.
First things first - I haven't been referred to as 'Hughes' since I left school, and that was over forty years ago, and I don't intend to start now - "Andy" if you want to be friendly, "Mr Hughes" if you want to be formal, "andy-hughes" to use my AB name, and "Hughes" not at all.
Thanks.
This woman is dangerous, allowing her back into our midst would be stupid beyond belief. She simply cannot be trusted."
How do you know that?
" She made her bed, now she should lie in it, well the remnants of it. "
Back to what I said about allowing people to make mistakes.
tambourine - ""....She said her house being bombed by the US-led coalition was the final straw......"
She hates our allies! Best she out."
I think I might be a tad miffed at any nation that was bombing my house - wouldn't you?
She didn't say that it was because it was the Allies bombing her house that she wanted out - I think that's a distinction that's maybe a little too subtle when you home is rubble.
Getting out would be the priority, not apportioning degrees of acceptance based on the label on the bombs you are trying to avoid!
She hates our allies! Best she out."
I think I might be a tad miffed at any nation that was bombing my house - wouldn't you?
She didn't say that it was because it was the Allies bombing her house that she wanted out - I think that's a distinction that's maybe a little too subtle when you home is rubble.
Getting out would be the priority, not apportioning degrees of acceptance based on the label on the bombs you are trying to avoid!
//I think I might be a tad miffed at any nation that was bombing my house - wouldn't you? //
And wouldn't she have realised that the coalition were bombing IS strongholds that SHE CHOSE to visit before she left the safety of this country and surely she knows exactly why IS are being bombed by the coalition but she still chose to go so it is tough if the government may choose not to have her back. She is in cahoots with this countries enemies.
And wouldn't she have realised that the coalition were bombing IS strongholds that SHE CHOSE to visit before she left the safety of this country and surely she knows exactly why IS are being bombed by the coalition but she still chose to go so it is tough if the government may choose not to have her back. She is in cahoots with this countries enemies.
Talbot - "ndy-hughes
retrocop - "It would seem beyond your comprehension. "
Billions of things are beyond my comprehension on a daily basis - that's why I ask for clarification when I am interested to explore further - can you oblige me?
andy, they can explain it to you, but they can't understand it for you."
I'm not asking them to understand it for me, but I am asking for an explanation - which I still haven't received at the time of posting.
retrocop - "It would seem beyond your comprehension. "
Billions of things are beyond my comprehension on a daily basis - that's why I ask for clarification when I am interested to explore further - can you oblige me?
andy, they can explain it to you, but they can't understand it for you."
I'm not asking them to understand it for me, but I am asking for an explanation - which I still haven't received at the time of posting.
Talbot - "ah...you don't recognize your own stock answer then?"
I recognise an answer Ihave used maybe twice - not sure it qualifies as a 'stock answer' - I don't tend to do those.
But on the occasions when I have said that, it is because I have attempted to explain a point a minimum of twice, before giving up.
So it doesn't apply here, does it?
I recognise an answer Ihave used maybe twice - not sure it qualifies as a 'stock answer' - I don't tend to do those.
But on the occasions when I have said that, it is because I have attempted to explain a point a minimum of twice, before giving up.
So it doesn't apply here, does it?
A-H
I am sure it is perfectly clear to all other ABers what Baldric and I were posting. We even helped you with your quotes.
Now I realise,by your pitiful display of faux mental instability in aogs post on Friday morning, that you are of a frail mental state but it speaks for itself if you go back and read your post to which we both replied with the same conclusion.
Incidentally. It would seem more than a coincidence that when you dominate a post and act "as a wrecking ball" as described by bazwillrun earlier then at least a few answers usually end up being removed or at worse the whole post gets pulled.This happened to aog's perfectly reasonable post until you took it over.
I can't be bothered wasting my time giving lengthy explanations to you only to see the post pulled later on because of your tedious ramblings.
I am sure it is perfectly clear to all other ABers what Baldric and I were posting. We even helped you with your quotes.
Now I realise,by your pitiful display of faux mental instability in aogs post on Friday morning, that you are of a frail mental state but it speaks for itself if you go back and read your post to which we both replied with the same conclusion.
Incidentally. It would seem more than a coincidence that when you dominate a post and act "as a wrecking ball" as described by bazwillrun earlier then at least a few answers usually end up being removed or at worse the whole post gets pulled.This happened to aog's perfectly reasonable post until you took it over.
I can't be bothered wasting my time giving lengthy explanations to you only to see the post pulled later on because of your tedious ramblings.
///I'm not asking them to understand it for me, but I am asking for an explanation - which I still haven't received at the time of posting.///
Andy, trying to explain anything to you is a complete waste of time, if it varies even slightly from ' Andy Hughes Ideal World' it is simply dismissed as it couldn't possibly be correct!
retrocop - "I can't be bothered wasting my time giving lengthy explanations to you only to see the post pulled later on because of your tedious ramblings. "
As you wish, but I think the post was pulled for reasons other than that - a particularly nasty personal insult may have been the last straw.
If - as is apparent, you simply have taken a dislike to me, which your posts appear to underline, then please yourself of my offer made once again in the interests of the site as a whole - feel free to ignore my posts at any time.
As you wish, but I think the post was pulled for reasons other than that - a particularly nasty personal insult may have been the last straw.
If - as is apparent, you simply have taken a dislike to me, which your posts appear to underline, then please yourself of my offer made once again in the interests of the site as a whole - feel free to ignore my posts at any time.
Latest Posts
News4 mins ago
Food & Drink5 mins ago
News5 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles7 mins ago
ChatterBank7 mins ago
