Home & Garden2 mins ago
Where Has The Cockney Gangster, Your Local Bred Lady Of The Night, And Even Your English Tramp Gone?
64 Answers
http://
Although Labour started the problem, all the blame cannot be attached to them solely, our politicians from all other parties have stood back and seen this happen not only to our capital but to other English towns and cities.
/// As for white, East End gangsters such as the Kray Twins, you will only find those in movies. ///
/// The same goes for the prostitutes who used to inhabit Soho. Even tramps, for goodness sake, are rarely English any more. Such is the level of liberal propaganda that we have largely remained blind to this startling transformation of our city. ///
Although Labour started the problem, all the blame cannot be attached to them solely, our politicians from all other parties have stood back and seen this happen not only to our capital but to other English towns and cities.
/// As for white, East End gangsters such as the Kray Twins, you will only find those in movies. ///
/// The same goes for the prostitutes who used to inhabit Soho. Even tramps, for goodness sake, are rarely English any more. Such is the level of liberal propaganda that we have largely remained blind to this startling transformation of our city. ///
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
London (and, to a lesser degree, many other towns and cities) has indeed always been a “melting pot”. The difference now is the numbers. The report says 55% are not white British and 40% were born abroad.
The influxes and mixes in the past which have been mentioned were nowhere near that great. There have always been pockets of Jews, Chinese and many other races and creeds but I doubt if, in recent times, foreign blood made up anything like 55%. (In fact I’d be surprised if this is not an under-estimate and in many parts the percentage of “British whites” – for want of a better term- is probably in the teens or single figures).
I worked in Central London for almost 30 years and I saw its decline during those years. Not all of that decline was due to migration but much of it was. I visit the city three or four times each month and it is, indeed, a city populated predominantly by people of foreign extraction. It is often difficult to make oneself understood in shops, restaurants bars and anywhere else for that matter and it is often not a pleasant experience.
I don’t think Mikey’s mention of the Roman Invasion is very appropriate. That was a military invasion followed by an occupation by a force intent on expanding its empire. This is far more subtle and stealthy. Most importantly of course the Romans eventually quit the UK (not in small part because they could not quell the Scots). There is no chance of that happening with the latest invaders and London (and much of the UK) has been irrevocably changed - and not entirely for the better.
The influxes and mixes in the past which have been mentioned were nowhere near that great. There have always been pockets of Jews, Chinese and many other races and creeds but I doubt if, in recent times, foreign blood made up anything like 55%. (In fact I’d be surprised if this is not an under-estimate and in many parts the percentage of “British whites” – for want of a better term- is probably in the teens or single figures).
I worked in Central London for almost 30 years and I saw its decline during those years. Not all of that decline was due to migration but much of it was. I visit the city three or four times each month and it is, indeed, a city populated predominantly by people of foreign extraction. It is often difficult to make oneself understood in shops, restaurants bars and anywhere else for that matter and it is often not a pleasant experience.
I don’t think Mikey’s mention of the Roman Invasion is very appropriate. That was a military invasion followed by an occupation by a force intent on expanding its empire. This is far more subtle and stealthy. Most importantly of course the Romans eventually quit the UK (not in small part because they could not quell the Scots). There is no chance of that happening with the latest invaders and London (and much of the UK) has been irrevocably changed - and not entirely for the better.
@ the loon from corby who insists on using caps as he thinks hes a bit of a lad..
and you think blacks wouldnt be happy if they were only surrounded by blacks, you think they wouldnt be happy if there werent any whites, you think they dont want to live surrounded by their own, people they identify with...same for asians, muslims etc...so why should whites be any different ?
and you think blacks wouldnt be happy if they were only surrounded by blacks, you think they wouldnt be happy if there werent any whites, you think they dont want to live surrounded by their own, people they identify with...same for asians, muslims etc...so why should whites be any different ?
for those who think the daily mail does nothing but print racist smears, then read about Mr Judah's book in a paper more to your political leanings:-
http://
there's no political hyperbole in this article, it just reviews his book. he has no political agenda, he just tells it as it is. where he's used statistics (he doesn't like them, he says), these are meticulously researched, and sources quoted.
there are (he says) 600,000 illegals working and living in London. because they're illegal the owe millions (collectively) to the criminals that brought them here. they live in appalling squalor, and are paid virtually nothing. This is modern day slavery. and because unscrupulous employers in slaves, they're not going to pay a living wage to those who are legitimately living here.
How can the left-leaning posters on here defend such a situation? is it that our society must be culturally enriched at any cost, even to the point of tolerating slavery? can you guys really defend that?
http://
there's no political hyperbole in this article, it just reviews his book. he has no political agenda, he just tells it as it is. where he's used statistics (he doesn't like them, he says), these are meticulously researched, and sources quoted.
there are (he says) 600,000 illegals working and living in London. because they're illegal the owe millions (collectively) to the criminals that brought them here. they live in appalling squalor, and are paid virtually nothing. This is modern day slavery. and because unscrupulous employers in slaves, they're not going to pay a living wage to those who are legitimately living here.
How can the left-leaning posters on here defend such a situation? is it that our society must be culturally enriched at any cost, even to the point of tolerating slavery? can you guys really defend that?
"Regarding using capitals, I have explained several times why I do that. "
nobody else needs to do it
nearly always black men going for trophy white women, hardly ever see a white male with a black female...or the now everyday PC adverts that seem to be trying to make a point and shoving it down everybodys throats with their PC meedja agenda....but the undeniable facts are that the vast majority of blacks would rather stick with blacks
nobody else needs to do it
nearly always black men going for trophy white women, hardly ever see a white male with a black female...or the now everyday PC adverts that seem to be trying to make a point and shoving it down everybodys throats with their PC meedja agenda....but the undeniable facts are that the vast majority of blacks would rather stick with blacks
Gromit
/// The country has been run by the Conservatives for nearly 6 years, and London for the past 8, so putting the blame on Labour is just Tory propaganda. ///
See my opening paragraph.
/// Of London's rough sleepers: ///
/// 86 per cent are male, 69 per cent are white. ///
Who made any suggestion of colour? and being white doesn't mean they are English. Regarding the amount of men sleeping rough, points to the unfair system that provides more facilities for homeless females.
/// 32 per cent have been in prison at some point, 10 per cent in care and 9 per cent in the British armed forces. ///
A national disgrace that our ex Armed forces are forced into criminality, through the lack of social adjustment, jobs and accommodation, when they have left the services.
/// Where nationality was recorded, 3,212 people rough sleeping were UK nationals - 43 per cent of the total. ///
That means that the majority of them were foreign nationals.
/// 7,581 people slept rough at some point in London during 2014/15, more than double the number in 2008/2009. ///
And yet we still take in more and more foreigners.
Thanks for the statistics Gromit, they have proved my point, without the need for me to do any researching.
/// The country has been run by the Conservatives for nearly 6 years, and London for the past 8, so putting the blame on Labour is just Tory propaganda. ///
See my opening paragraph.
/// Of London's rough sleepers: ///
/// 86 per cent are male, 69 per cent are white. ///
Who made any suggestion of colour? and being white doesn't mean they are English. Regarding the amount of men sleeping rough, points to the unfair system that provides more facilities for homeless females.
/// 32 per cent have been in prison at some point, 10 per cent in care and 9 per cent in the British armed forces. ///
A national disgrace that our ex Armed forces are forced into criminality, through the lack of social adjustment, jobs and accommodation, when they have left the services.
/// Where nationality was recorded, 3,212 people rough sleeping were UK nationals - 43 per cent of the total. ///
That means that the majority of them were foreign nationals.
/// 7,581 people slept rough at some point in London during 2014/15, more than double the number in 2008/2009. ///
And yet we still take in more and more foreigners.
Thanks for the statistics Gromit, they have proved my point, without the need for me to do any researching.
you really do think youre a bit of a lad dont you, is caps the only way you can get noticed in life
Why should i be forced to leave my country ?
if people like you are happy to see it destroyed and it would seem encourage whats going on then dont be surprised when others speak out against it and eventually take action to stop it one way or another....
Why should i be forced to leave my country ?
if people like you are happy to see it destroyed and it would seem encourage whats going on then dont be surprised when others speak out against it and eventually take action to stop it one way or another....
Gromit
/// If 43% of tramps being indigenous is proof that they are rare, then my stats have helped you. But I suspect you are deliberately misinterpreting them. ///
Can't see any suggestion of 'Tramps' in your statistics Gromit.
But if you are a little confused between rough sleepers and tramps, allow me to give you the definition of TRAMPS.
*** a person who travels from place to place on foot in search of work or as a vagrant or beggar. ***
/// If 43% of tramps being indigenous is proof that they are rare, then my stats have helped you. But I suspect you are deliberately misinterpreting them. ///
Can't see any suggestion of 'Tramps' in your statistics Gromit.
But if you are a little confused between rough sleepers and tramps, allow me to give you the definition of TRAMPS.
*** a person who travels from place to place on foot in search of work or as a vagrant or beggar. ***
Latest Posts
News3 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles10 mins ago
New I V F Rules?? Why Do They Even Do It...
News10 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.