News1 min ago
Where Has The Cockney Gangster, Your Local Bred Lady Of The Night, And Even Your English Tramp Gone?
64 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/c olumnis ts/arti cle-341 2616/Ho w-Labou r-turne d-Londo n-forei gn-city .html
Although Labour started the problem, all the blame cannot be attached to them solely, our politicians from all other parties have stood back and seen this happen not only to our capital but to other English towns and cities.
/// As for white, East End gangsters such as the Kray Twins, you will only find those in movies. ///
/// The same goes for the prostitutes who used to inhabit Soho. Even tramps, for goodness sake, are rarely English any more. Such is the level of liberal propaganda that we have largely remained blind to this startling transformation of our city. ///
Although Labour started the problem, all the blame cannot be attached to them solely, our politicians from all other parties have stood back and seen this happen not only to our capital but to other English towns and cities.
/// As for white, East End gangsters such as the Kray Twins, you will only find those in movies. ///
/// The same goes for the prostitutes who used to inhabit Soho. Even tramps, for goodness sake, are rarely English any more. Such is the level of liberal propaganda that we have largely remained blind to this startling transformation of our city. ///
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Gromit
http:// diction ary.cam bridge. org/dic tionary /englis h/tramp
Are these also tramps?
http:// i.daily mail.co .uk/i/p ix/2016 /01/22/ 23/0DA0 78D8000 00514-3 412616- Homeles s_Roma_ immigra nts_are -m-5_14 5350705 5658.jp g
/// It is a similar story with prostitutes. About 40% are indigenous and 60% foreign in London. Again, anyone claiming 40% is proof of rarity is being deliberately obtuse. ///
Still proves that they are in a minority in their own country.
http://
Are these also tramps?
http://
/// It is a similar story with prostitutes. About 40% are indigenous and 60% foreign in London. Again, anyone claiming 40% is proof of rarity is being deliberately obtuse. ///
Still proves that they are in a minority in their own country.
49.9% is a minority.
If 4 out of 10 peostitutes are indigenous, and the same for tramps, then it is not accurate to say they are rare.
If there is 1 English prostitute working out of 5000 then she/he would be rare.
But There are thousands of English prostitues so they are not rare. They may be a minority, but not rare.
Now Off to watch boring Man United, who will probably appear entertaining after this.
If 4 out of 10 peostitutes are indigenous, and the same for tramps, then it is not accurate to say they are rare.
If there is 1 English prostitute working out of 5000 then she/he would be rare.
But There are thousands of English prostitues so they are not rare. They may be a minority, but not rare.
Now Off to watch boring Man United, who will probably appear entertaining after this.
baroness scotland got caught out with an illegal employee. quite frankly i don't believe she didn't know; I also believe it likely that many other politicos - of all political persuasions - are doing the same thing, although taking steps to ensure they don't get caught. it's human nature; who's going to pay £7 an hour for their moldovan nanny, their brazilian gardener, their congolese office cleaner, when they can get away with £2.50 an hour? those employment agencies doing well are those with the illegal worker business plan, they'll outperform the competition even when the odd court appearance is factored in; the penalties are rarely punitive and are just another business expense. while the establishment tolerates this situation, the concept of a "living wage" will be for many, legitimate or illegal, just a vey bad joke.
“BAZWILLRUN if this country has such a poor outlook, why do you not emigrate?”
I’d better make sure I’ve got this straight: Millions of people are decamping from Middle Eastern and Third World cesspits because they are very unpleasant and they would prefer to live in Europe. Many of them end up here in the UK. The result is that many parts of the UK are transformed and now resemble the Middle Eastern and Third World cesspits they left. Baz is none too fond of it here (as many are not), not because of the way it was, but because of the way it now is, having been transformed by mass, virtually uncontrolled immigration which was permitted without their agreement. The solution you put forward, Corby, is for Baz to decamp.
If you examine the “net” migration figures you will see that last year it was around 335,000. But hidden (probably purposely) behind this is another even more disturbing fact. Immigration to the UK stood at over 635,000. In essence 300,000 people left the UK (probably taking up your suggestion that those unhappy with it here should leave). It probably comes as no surprise that the majority of those leaving were in the high earning or high wealth category (most other countries outside the EU won’t take them unless they are) whilst the majority of those arriving are unskilled, low earners of low wealth. Your suggestion seems to accept that it is quite OK for the population of the UK to be swapped in this way and the fact that it will accelerate the country’s decline into a Third World cesspit is of little consequence.
I find it incredible that a person who witnesses the demise of his town or city, brought on by a massive influx of foreigners who (a) cannot be properly accommodated and (b) have standards considerably different (dare I be judgemental and say much lower) than his own is told the solution to “his problem” is to clear off. I’m not often lost for a word or two, Corby, but your solution to Baz's discomfortthat leaves me, for the moment anyway, somewhat speechless !!!
I’d better make sure I’ve got this straight: Millions of people are decamping from Middle Eastern and Third World cesspits because they are very unpleasant and they would prefer to live in Europe. Many of them end up here in the UK. The result is that many parts of the UK are transformed and now resemble the Middle Eastern and Third World cesspits they left. Baz is none too fond of it here (as many are not), not because of the way it was, but because of the way it now is, having been transformed by mass, virtually uncontrolled immigration which was permitted without their agreement. The solution you put forward, Corby, is for Baz to decamp.
If you examine the “net” migration figures you will see that last year it was around 335,000. But hidden (probably purposely) behind this is another even more disturbing fact. Immigration to the UK stood at over 635,000. In essence 300,000 people left the UK (probably taking up your suggestion that those unhappy with it here should leave). It probably comes as no surprise that the majority of those leaving were in the high earning or high wealth category (most other countries outside the EU won’t take them unless they are) whilst the majority of those arriving are unskilled, low earners of low wealth. Your suggestion seems to accept that it is quite OK for the population of the UK to be swapped in this way and the fact that it will accelerate the country’s decline into a Third World cesspit is of little consequence.
I find it incredible that a person who witnesses the demise of his town or city, brought on by a massive influx of foreigners who (a) cannot be properly accommodated and (b) have standards considerably different (dare I be judgemental and say much lower) than his own is told the solution to “his problem” is to clear off. I’m not often lost for a word or two, Corby, but your solution to Baz's discomfortthat leaves me, for the moment anyway, somewhat speechless !!!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.