Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
What Happened Next?
Last week the DM ran a story about a man walking through a tube station, being accused of sexually assaulting a woman also walking through. From CCTV, it was obvious no such thing happened, yet the man was charged by police. What happened next?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by lynbrown. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Togo...I would love to say that I do trust the CPS, because if we lose trust in an organization that is so central to the well-being of our country, than all is lost. But cases like this bring it into serious disrepute, and will have the knock-on effect of the boy that cried wolf.
If there lurks in the back of Jurors mind that, that the CPS shouldn't have brought a case to Court, then how can we rely on them to give credence to other cases ? We already have doubt lingering when a Police Officer appears in Court, with his shiny buttons, that he may not be speaking the truth.
Is sad and I can't see a solution at present.
If there lurks in the back of Jurors mind that, that the CPS shouldn't have brought a case to Court, then how can we rely on them to give credence to other cases ? We already have doubt lingering when a Police Officer appears in Court, with his shiny buttons, that he may not be speaking the truth.
Is sad and I can't see a solution at present.
vulvan
I think the CPS operate on the basis
if we bring the case does it have a reasonable chance of success ( success is proving beyond reasonable doubt )
and is it in the public interest ?
and so there is always an element of doubt in the choices made
In sex cases there has recently been more - 'let the jury decide'
altho I can see obvious drawbacks in this instant case
If you have the same set of cases and you decide to prosecute a greater proportion - then the success rate will inevitably go down
the DPP has been remarkably resistant to this obvious truth
I think the CPS operate on the basis
if we bring the case does it have a reasonable chance of success ( success is proving beyond reasonable doubt )
and is it in the public interest ?
and so there is always an element of doubt in the choices made
In sex cases there has recently been more - 'let the jury decide'
altho I can see obvious drawbacks in this instant case
If you have the same set of cases and you decide to prosecute a greater proportion - then the success rate will inevitably go down
the DPP has been remarkably resistant to this obvious truth