Donate SIGN UP

What Happenned Here Then?

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 15:24 Mon 14th Mar 2016 | News
20 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-35798523
Surely it's not possible to commit nastiness under the influence of the FBWD!
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 20rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
What does FBWD stand for TTT?

From a quick google it appears that it stands for "facebooking while drunk"...

... which feels vaguely related to your recent posting style.

I don't think anyone argues there are no negative effects to cannabis, especially prolonged useage. This case is obviously not a 1:1 of "had a joint", "killed some people". There's a lot going on here.
Where does FaceBook come in to it?
Forbidden Weed ?
It doesn't hc.
FBWD = Fluffy Bunny Wonder Drug = Cannabis.

Another one of TGT tedious made up acronyms.
Could be retrocop!
Oh god, is it really Jack?
My fluffy bunnies were quite contented with lettuce.
It certainly is possible to commit a crime whether one is under the influence of any intoxicating substance and even when one isn't.

Is it cos it's too long-winded to type in full?
Question Author
well every time it comes up, the devotees tell me how wonderful it is so from that I assumed it must be a harmless, useful cure all, thus Fluffy Bunny Wonder Drug, FBWD.
Maybe worth adding to your filter ABEd.

Blimey. That's a lot of work. Glad you saved time by abbreviating it.

Did you give yourself a nickname at school too? :)

There is a trend towards imagining no harm comes from weed usage, and it's just a slightly unexamined position to hold.

Should it be legal? I think it's already accessible, so maybe making it "legal" would at least keep the money out of criminal pockets - and line HMRC's a bit more.

No one is going to be able to smoke it in a pub, club, or a public space - so it shouldn't be too much of a nuisance.

The only issue is the long term psychological damage it can do. Paranoia, depression and so on are regularly linked to prolonged weed usage - usually in men in their 40s, long after they've given it up.

We're hardly set for dealing with the luxury of mental illness currently, let along if we cause a epidemic in 20 year's time.
never mind FBWD - i'm waiting to see who clouds the issue with Jean-Charles de Menezes or Mark Duggan.
mushroom25

Err...that would be you.

TTT...you're stream of personalised abbreviations and allusions (jimmyk for Nicola Sturgeon, Shermans for Americans) is...wonderful.

Probably.
"...is...wonderful.

Probably."

No, it isn't.
TTT...what a pity that you handicapped this thread right from the start by using this tedious acronym.

This is a serious piece of news, and with respect, I think you should have treated it seriously.

On a side issue, how on earth does a 6 year old get to use drugs ?
Spot on Ed

//The only issue is the long term psychological damage it can do. Paranoia, depression and so on are regularly linked to prolonged weed usage - usually in men in their 40s, long after they've given it up.

We're hardly set for dealing with the luxury of mental illness currently, let along if we cause a epidemic in 20 year's time.//

I agree. I will save that one for a later date.
I agree as well Retro....legalizing cannabis will only result in yet more potheads, and I think we have quite enough of those already.

1 to 20 of 20rss feed

Do you know the answer?

What Happenned Here Then?

Answer Question >>