News15 mins ago
Grammar Schools
It would seem that Mrs May is poised to take Britain back to the 1950's here.
This man is the Chief Inspector of Schools, so he should know what he is talking about ::::
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/vi deo_and _audio/ headlin es/3731 6202
This man is the Chief Inspector of Schools, so he should know what he is talking about ::::
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.// The reason so many people need to go to “university” is because the State education system is singularly unable to provide a decent academic secondary education by the age of 18.//
this is new judge-speak and not the opinion of some mandarin at the Ministry innit ? No one in govt is saying ( or has said ) that you need universities because skoolz are so bad - or are they ?
and Mikey is right - the percentage pupils going to uni from state schools has fallen - so grammar schools were an agent of social change and not a barrier
this is new judge-speak and not the opinion of some mandarin at the Ministry innit ? No one in govt is saying ( or has said ) that you need universities because skoolz are so bad - or are they ?
and Mikey is right - the percentage pupils going to uni from state schools has fallen - so grammar schools were an agent of social change and not a barrier
I think it fair enough that there is only State schools. The State is responsible for ensuring all get as good a level of education as possible commiserate with their abilities. Having all State avoids schools pushing religious agendas. And private schools are either no better than State so the parents need help in not getting taken for a ride, or they are and some are buying a better education when others' parents can not afford it. Not a level playing field.
Such schools ought to be operating within the State system instead, passing on their best practices info as advice.
Meanwhile streaming into different types of school to best match teaching method and pupil ability, is no bad thing. The problem was always only later developers and how/whether to switch schools. But no system is going to be perfect.
Such schools ought to be operating within the State system instead, passing on their best practices info as advice.
Meanwhile streaming into different types of school to best match teaching method and pupil ability, is no bad thing. The problem was always only later developers and how/whether to switch schools. But no system is going to be perfect.
I base my argument, Peter, on the fact that the proportion of jobs in the UK that truly require a "proper" degree level education is about the same now as it was fifty years ago. Yet employers feel the need to require a degree now for jobs which, then, would have required three to five decent 'O' Levels.
The result is that four out of five people who graduate with £27k+ worth of debt (having been encouraged to believe that the world will be their oyster) end up doing a job that fifty years ago would have been undertaken by a sixteen year old. Unsurprisingly they are somewhat disappointed.
The result is that four out of five people who graduate with £27k+ worth of debt (having been encouraged to believe that the world will be their oyster) end up doing a job that fifty years ago would have been undertaken by a sixteen year old. Unsurprisingly they are somewhat disappointed.
-- answer removed --
Thanks for the nostalgia, chiaroscuro. I took my 'O' Level maths a little later than 1957 but the paper was similar. However, I don't recall a section on the history of maths. Looking at the paper I's be OK with the arithmetic and geometry (with a little bit of brushing up). I'm not sure I'd do quite so well with the algebra (which was never my strong point) but I daresay I'd get by. I reckon I'd pass with a fairly good grade.
Yes, db. In the late 1960s five good 'O' Levels (including maths and a science would see you eligible to apply for a short-service commission in the RAF in groundstaff disciplines. 2 'A' Levels required for aircrew.
Yes, db. In the late 1960s five good 'O' Levels (including maths and a science would see you eligible to apply for a short-service commission in the RAF in groundstaff disciplines. 2 'A' Levels required for aircrew.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
// NJ. How true. There was a time 5 'O' Levels could get you a really good job/career. That was once the min requirement for a pilot.//
god knows when and where
1968 9 o levels and a handful of a levels - I got a job as a techie at Porton Down - £32 / month I remember - five week months were a problem for lodgings at £7 /wk
sorry boys - a bit of an unwelcome reality check there
god knows when and where
1968 9 o levels and a handful of a levels - I got a job as a techie at Porton Down - £32 / month I remember - five week months were a problem for lodgings at £7 /wk
sorry boys - a bit of an unwelcome reality check there
// jno, I must admit that those of us who passed 11+ could be a bit sniffy towards those who passed 13+.//
first menion - ever - 13+ this year
for the kidz who realised that failing the 11+ was a big career mistake
part time day release and colleges of further education seem to have passed beyond as well
first menion - ever - 13+ this year
for the kidz who realised that failing the 11+ was a big career mistake
part time day release and colleges of further education seem to have passed beyond as well
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --