T W A U ... The Chase...from...
Film, Media & TV2 mins ago
Trumpageddon Is Comming......
48 Answers
http://
Let's save all the climate data! PMSL! do we really share the planet with these people?
Let's save all the climate data! PMSL! do we really share the planet with these people?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
But even accepting that your logic is "undeniable", or whatever, it's still leading you to the wrong conclusions. In which case all that changes is that you need better priors to process with your logic.
For example, actually getting a basic science education wouldn't hurt. After that, actually not assuming that a basic science education is somehow all you need is probably a good idea as well.
Same advice goes to NJ, for that matter.
For example, actually getting a basic science education wouldn't hurt. After that, actually not assuming that a basic science education is somehow all you need is probably a good idea as well.
Same advice goes to NJ, for that matter.
" 4% of something is more important that 96% of something."
Because the 96% was already there. Because there also exist carbon sinks in nature, that manage to counterbalance a lot of the natural carbon output.
And because small changes in an otherwise unstable system are potentially huge when accumulated over a long- or even medium-term period.
Because the 96% was already there. Because there also exist carbon sinks in nature, that manage to counterbalance a lot of the natural carbon output.
And because small changes in an otherwise unstable system are potentially huge when accumulated over a long- or even medium-term period.
-- answer removed --
More seriously, the problem with using polar bears anti-global warming evidence is that (a) data is anyway not totally perfect, so the total numbers are only estimates, (b) Climate change remains more of a longer-term threat than a short-term one, although the extent Arctic Sea ice is decreasing on average, so this pressure will only continue to grow, and (c) until recently, hunting of polar bears was a far greater threat, and even after it was banned or heavily restricted it took some time for the populations to recover.
The Climate Change pressure on polar bear populations is therefore only a subleading effect, but it is real, and likely to dominate in the near-ish future.
The Climate Change pressure on polar bear populations is therefore only a subleading effect, but it is real, and likely to dominate in the near-ish future.
Signal-to-background, TTT. Read about it.
And until then, everything you post shows that you don't understand the facts, or have any hope of doing so.
The human effect is real, and it's something that neither can nor should be ignored. What it holds for our or the planet's future I can't and won't say, but current human activity is certainly unsustainable.
And until then, everything you post shows that you don't understand the facts, or have any hope of doing so.
The human effect is real, and it's something that neither can nor should be ignored. What it holds for our or the planet's future I can't and won't say, but current human activity is certainly unsustainable.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
