Donate SIGN UP

Police Out Of Order, Or Not? I Think The Female

Avatar Image
trt | 13:02 Fri 20th Jan 2017 | News
114 Answers
officer was a bit to quick to fire the taser, and didn't give proper warnings, as instructed in training.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4139478/Police-taser-race-relations-adviser-face.html
Gravatar

Answers

81 to 100 of 114rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by trt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Andy....just noticed that you were ahead of me, with the Not the nine of Clock News sketch !

What on Earth has the 17:31 link got to do with it?

Also the one @ 18:19
-- answer removed --
Taser Taser taser you've been tasered ... no flies on officer Sherlock she's really on the ball.

Police guidelines on using tasers
Don't let a *** idiot touch one.

If this man deserved being tasered then I know hundreds of people who should have been tasered at least once in their life including myself and I bet if some on here were honest enough they would admit that maybe they should have too.
.
I have had the pleasure of headbutting a coppers truncheon simply because as he ran towards some knobheads who were trying to tip a burger van up he ran into me. I didn't expect an apology but I didn't expect him to show me his Mr Punch impression either. Thankfully tasers hadn't been invented then.
If the police thought (had a reasonable suspicion ) that he was wanted
then it has an awful inevitability about it

even if he says " I am john smith " they are gonna say
no you arent you are f nicked mate

in terms of identity
the neighbour vouches for him

but hell the police just go ahead and tazer him
divebuddy - //Baldric. Good question. The answer is, of course, nothing. But it does show very clearly, I believe, that both Andy and Mikey think that the police don't like black people. //

No, what it actually shows is that you will lose no opportunity, however vague, to take issue with something that I post.

The link regarding the sketch was not aimed at you, you are not obliged to understand why I posted it, and clearly you don't, so this is my last word on the subject - except to say that my views on the police are well known to any and all regulars on here, and cannot be adapted in order to give you another opportunity to start a pointless argument with me - yet again.
-- answer removed --

I'm not taking any sides in this, but I would be interested in the reason you or indeed Mikey, thought it was a justifiable thing to post.
The sketch - in case there is an doubt about its meaning, is a serious and satirical exaggeration of a bigoted Neanderthal racist policeman. The purpose of it is, by extreme exaggeration to the point of non-reason, is to show just how ludicrous such a viewpoint is.

In response to Randy-Marsh's point about the gentleman walking his dog, I suggested that the sketch could include the line about a black man minding his own business walking his dog - inferring that the police taking issue with that could be seen as slightly unreasonable, and it was intended to be tongue-in-cheek, and I am sure R-M -to whom it was directed, understood it as such - obviously he can argue if that is not the case.

Now Divebuddy, if you can translate that into seeing a view by me that the police do not like black people, then for the absolutely last time, you are mistaken.

I don't care how your misapprehension occurred, whether the satire floated over your head, or you simply decided it was something else to pick a fight with me about, it doesn't matter.

The point is, I don't think the police are racist, and anyone who knows me at all on this site knows that to be true.

Right - can we please drop it now?

Thank you.
-- answer removed --
Divebuddy - I have done the courtesy of answering your query as fully as I am able, several times.

If you wish to see me as a bigot, that makes it your view, not a fact.

You are determined to maintain that view, despite my efforts to explain otherwise, so there is nothing more I can say.

I don't know why you delight in endless day-in-day-out conflict with me to the degree that you do, but please be on notice - it stops here, because it is inaccurate, tiresome, and futile.

So in future, go and needle someone else, I am tired of your constant carping and bitching, and I strongly suspect I am not alone.
I totally get what Andy means.
I totally agree what Andy and randy mean.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
DB, do you thrive on conflict as much as it seems?
-- answer removed --
The thread was flowing fine and the references all made sense even if one did not agree with all of them - and then it begins.

The badgering , that attempts to trip up,catch out or corral someone into a corner.

It is becoming too often and is tedious and destructive.
anneasquith
I totally agree what Andy and randy mean.

Did you mean
I totally agree what andy and Randy mean.
?

81 to 100 of 114rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Police Out Of Order, Or Not? I Think The Female

Answer Question >>

Related Questions