Quizzes & Puzzles34 mins ago
Who Is The Real Racist, Sadiq Khan Or Trump?
Nigel Farage tells, in no uncertain terms;
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.naomi24
In the context of what Trump said about Gonzalo Curiel, he's wrong and so are you.
Trump suggested that Curiel was giving unfair rulings against him because he is Mexican.
However, as a prosecutor in the late 1990s Curiel, went after Mexican drug cartels, making him a target for assassination by a Tijuana drug lord.
That means that he is the enemy of the very people that Trump wants to keep out of America.
To use the reductive position that because Curiel is Mexican he cannot do his job is fatuous, reductive and racist.
In the context of what Trump said about Gonzalo Curiel, he's wrong and so are you.
Trump suggested that Curiel was giving unfair rulings against him because he is Mexican.
However, as a prosecutor in the late 1990s Curiel, went after Mexican drug cartels, making him a target for assassination by a Tijuana drug lord.
That means that he is the enemy of the very people that Trump wants to keep out of America.
To use the reductive position that because Curiel is Mexican he cannot do his job is fatuous, reductive and racist.
Talbot - //So you think he is defending him too, andy.
Glad we agree. //
And the 'So' rule strikes again - third time today.
I have no opinion on whether or not Gromit is defending Mr Khan - another of your never-ending incorrect assumptions on what you think I think - based on your over-active imagination.
My point is that your hectoring tone is more appropriate in an episode of Suits than it is on here.
Glad we agree. //
And the 'So' rule strikes again - third time today.
I have no opinion on whether or not Gromit is defending Mr Khan - another of your never-ending incorrect assumptions on what you think I think - based on your over-active imagination.
My point is that your hectoring tone is more appropriate in an episode of Suits than it is on here.
Talbot,
I acknowledged it was the wrong phrase in my post at 14:46.
I am not defending the phrase, I am attacking the inference that some of you have put on it. He did not mean they are subserviant and excessively eager to please. That was not his point, but that is what he said by not finding the correct term.
He was talking unscripted and he didn't use the correct phrase. And apologised the next day.
I acknowledged it was the wrong phrase in my post at 14:46.
I am not defending the phrase, I am attacking the inference that some of you have put on it. He did not mean they are subserviant and excessively eager to please. That was not his point, but that is what he said by not finding the correct term.
He was talking unscripted and he didn't use the correct phrase. And apologised the next day.
// The full quotation (which The Daily Mail ‘buries’ about two-thirds into the article) is: ‘I wish we only spoke to people who agree with us. I can tell you that I’ve spent the last months in this job speaking to all sorts of people. Not just leaders, not just organisations but ordinary rank and file citizens of Muslim faith and that’s what good government is about, it’s about engaging with all stakeholders. You can talk about articles in the newspapers about what an organisation might get but the point is you can’t just pick and choose who you speak to, you can’t just speak to Uncle Toms.’ //
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.