As usual po-faced anti-fun campaigners make a point of deriding Pride and sneering about "creeps and weirdos" (as if there's anything wrong with being weird if you're just outside having fun) then experience an attack of the vapours when anybody criticises their ideas.
Let's round up the main objections to Pride:
1.Pride is a bit inconvenient for people going out to lunch.
This is the flimsiest pretext I've heard in a long while for whinging about things the poster clearly just a personal distaste for. All public marches and festivals are an inconvenience to some degree or another, and the only way to avoid this is to abolish all cultural life and ban all public festivals across the land. Which is rather Victorian, not to say miserable and self-centred.
2. The people who march in Pride are somehow objectionable.
This is not a valid opinion because all kinds of people go to Pride. People who say this do not know what they are talking about. More often than not another flimsy pretext for being anti-gay.
3. There is nothing to celebrate.
Only works if you think the UK's extension of basic rights to its LGBT citizens is not worth celebrating. Which, unless you have a problem with LGBT people, it patently is.
4. Being gay is wrong/unnatural/a "flaw"
This is, fundamentally, what usually motivates people objecting to Pride. It's nonsense. because a) being gay it is not provably morally wrong b) homosexual/bisexual behaviour occurs in the natural world quite frequently c) it's only a flaw if you assume the only possible purpose in life is to breed. If you want to not breed (as I don't), being gay is a positive asset!
5. It's expensive
Everything worth doing is expensive.