/A report by Peter Clarke, the Chief Inspector of Prisons, said: ‘The food that we sampled was adequate, but most dishes comprised Western-style food and the menu lacked cultural diversity. The lunchtime meal consisted largely of baguettes or salad. There was very little in any of the menus to reflect the normal diets of, for example, Chinese or African women.’
Food should be suited to the ‘religious and cultural needs’ of detainees, said the report for HM Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP). Menus should ‘reflect the diverse needs of the population’.
However, managers were praised for preparing meals suitable for vegetarians, vegans and those with halal diets. Detainees also had access to kitchens where they could cook their own food.//
.
Food should be suited to the ‘religious and cultural needs’ of detainees, said the report", and "Menus should ‘reflect the diverse needs of the population'".
Why? If they were particularly bothered by these trivia then, presumably, the detainees (the population?) wouldn't have chosen to leave the country where their "needs" were properly catered for.
Is there a flaw in that line of reasoning?