Crosswords0 min ago
Should ‘Britain First’ Now Be Banned ?
With the conviction of Darren Osbourne, evidence in court shows he was radicalised by visiting the Britain First website over several weeks.
He then went on to kill someone in a terrorist attack, and injury scores of others.
// But the trigger for the attack was far-right internet propaganda he had become obsessed with over just a few weeks. //
// Police said the 48-year-old became radicalised in just three to four weeks, as evidence from devices he used show him reading posts by the former English Defence League leader Tommy Robinson, far-right group Britain First and other extremists. //
Surely this shows that Britain First crosses the line from being a genuine protest group, and firmly places them in the position that they encourage terrorism, and indoctrinate gullible fools to commit murder.
Many muslim groups have been proscribed for less. They are on par with Scottish Dawn and should be treated similarly.
He then went on to kill someone in a terrorist attack, and injury scores of others.
// But the trigger for the attack was far-right internet propaganda he had become obsessed with over just a few weeks. //
// Police said the 48-year-old became radicalised in just three to four weeks, as evidence from devices he used show him reading posts by the former English Defence League leader Tommy Robinson, far-right group Britain First and other extremists. //
Surely this shows that Britain First crosses the line from being a genuine protest group, and firmly places them in the position that they encourage terrorism, and indoctrinate gullible fools to commit murder.
Many muslim groups have been proscribed for less. They are on par with Scottish Dawn and should be treated similarly.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.BF should be proscribed ASAP. Its been obvious what kind of organisation is really is for many months.
Its Leaders are in Court soon, in Belfast.
But it seems that no matter what they do, they will always have some reluctant supporters on AB....the kind of people that post comments, supporting when BF make anti-Muslim tweets.
Its Leaders are in Court soon, in Belfast.
But it seems that no matter what they do, they will always have some reluctant supporters on AB....the kind of people that post comments, supporting when BF make anti-Muslim tweets.
He was first radicalised by a BBC programme, http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ program mes/b08 rgd5n
And, yes, you are right. We should ban ^them.
And, yes, you are right. We should ban ^them.
What were the other extremist groups he read up on and visited?
What other extremist groups are banned and how is that going?
Being a racist and spouting racist views doesn't mean they insite violence per sa. So have any of you visited these extremist BF sites and checked out what was said? And of course have you visited other extremist sites such as Islamic sites and done the same to compare?
What other extremist groups are banned and how is that going?
Being a racist and spouting racist views doesn't mean they insite violence per sa. So have any of you visited these extremist BF sites and checked out what was said? And of course have you visited other extremist sites such as Islamic sites and done the same to compare?
Emmie....quite a few organisations are already proscribed, and yes, you are right, if any group spreads hate and racism, yes...of course they should be banned::
https:/ /www.go v.uk/go vernmen t/uploa ds/syst em/uplo ads/att achment _data/f ile/670 599/201 71222_P roscrip tion.pd f
https:/
Nobody nor any organisation should be banned in a free country - unless they are actually inciting violence.
We have ample laws to cover all eventualities, we already have far too many thought police trying to tell us what to do and think as they do.
Neither the Muslim Brotherhood (whom incidentally, I dislike intensely) nor the Britain First Group (whom I don't support) are actually inciting violence.
mikey; The OP contains the name of Tommy Robinson who is a good, brave man, so I see no reason not to bring in the name of Jeremy Corbyn as I see fit.
We have ample laws to cover all eventualities, we already have far too many thought police trying to tell us what to do and think as they do.
Neither the Muslim Brotherhood (whom incidentally, I dislike intensely) nor the Britain First Group (whom I don't support) are actually inciting violence.
mikey; The OP contains the name of Tommy Robinson who is a good, brave man, so I see no reason not to bring in the name of Jeremy Corbyn as I see fit.
AOG, It is a level playing field.
https:/ /www.go v.uk/go vernmen t/uploa ds/syst em/uplo ads/att achment _data/f ile/670 599/201 71222_P roscrip tion.pd f
https:/
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
"Surely this shows that Britain First crosses the line from being a genuine protest group, and firmly places them in the position that they encourage terrorism, and indoctrinate gullible fools to commit murder": yes indeed and they should be banned along with all the islamic groups doing the same thing.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.