Family & Relationships4 mins ago
Westminster Question Time
Watching this and am pretty disgusted with the antics of our MPs, discussing the Russian situation.
Surely in this, they can all get together and decide the best way to proceed instead of squabbling like kids in a playground!!!
Surely in this, they can all get together and decide the best way to proceed instead of squabbling like kids in a playground!!!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by -SharonA-. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.“We now enter the era of The Rule of Lynch.”
Here here 7op!
I can’t believe I’m actually reading this “ freeze the oligarchs assets?”
On what grounds and does Westminster realise the amount of rubles/pound they bring to the economy?
They obviously haven’t thought this out properly and my guess is that’s it just a lot of unnecessary grunting and chest beating.
Which is to be taken literally in the commons, lol.
Here here 7op!
I can’t believe I’m actually reading this “ freeze the oligarchs assets?”
On what grounds and does Westminster realise the amount of rubles/pound they bring to the economy?
They obviously haven’t thought this out properly and my guess is that’s it just a lot of unnecessary grunting and chest beating.
Which is to be taken literally in the commons, lol.
And you suppose that there is not?
Or are you expecting the government to pitch up on your doorstep (wherever that may be) with all the gumf from Porton Down, Scotland Yard etc just for your benefit?
And, i am bound to say, that that would probably not be enough for you, because there's nothing like hard evidence to kill an overactive imagination stone dead :-)
Or are you expecting the government to pitch up on your doorstep (wherever that may be) with all the gumf from Porton Down, Scotland Yard etc just for your benefit?
And, i am bound to say, that that would probably not be enough for you, because there's nothing like hard evidence to kill an overactive imagination stone dead :-)
// Isn't it a disgrace: an honest chemical war criminal can't go and poison people in a public park without a load of nasty squabbling politicians ruining it :-)//
I agree itchi - dear sweet old AOG drew the difference between a criminal act by a DOC and state spondored assassination
which I then impishly illustrated with quaint exsamples.
today I choose The bartholomews days massacre 1572 and the assassination of WIlliam the Silent in 1580. Or perhaps the stabbing of henry III by Ravaillac 1610.
( henri III de france that is!) I will let you work out which is which
I was gonna point out that when Germany invaded Russian in 1941 - no one said - "oo have dey? wared evidence for dat den ?" - they sortta ducked and ran as the mechanised Hun hordes ran over them.
( sorry about that Itchi - had a bad run wiv Mae West earlier on )
I agree itchi - dear sweet old AOG drew the difference between a criminal act by a DOC and state spondored assassination
which I then impishly illustrated with quaint exsamples.
today I choose The bartholomews days massacre 1572 and the assassination of WIlliam the Silent in 1580. Or perhaps the stabbing of henry III by Ravaillac 1610.
( henri III de france that is!) I will let you work out which is which
I was gonna point out that when Germany invaded Russian in 1941 - no one said - "oo have dey? wared evidence for dat den ?" - they sortta ducked and ran as the mechanised Hun hordes ran over them.
( sorry about that Itchi - had a bad run wiv Mae West earlier on )
hey for state sponsored assassination
what about .....
the killing of the greek Generals at dindins ( the meal and not the place ) - which caused Xenophon to lead the 10 000 to Trebizon - in Anabasis ? ( the book and not the method of transport )
You know where they run towards the sea shouting
thalatta! thalatta! - 'cause they then knew they could get home.
what about .....
the killing of the greek Generals at dindins ( the meal and not the place ) - which caused Xenophon to lead the 10 000 to Trebizon - in Anabasis ? ( the book and not the method of transport )
You know where they run towards the sea shouting
thalatta! thalatta! - 'cause they then knew they could get home.
"Or are you expecting the government to pitch up on your doorstep (wherever that may be) with all the gumf from Porton Down, Scotland Yard etc just for your benefit?
And, i am bound to say, that that would probably not be enough for you, because there's nothing like hard evidence to kill an overactive imagination stone dead :-) "
Ah, so we have The Holy Cloak of National Security - Need to Know? - being drawn this time not by the State, but one willing minion,and The Holy Cloak of Satire by another.
Is this suitable evidence Peter-P
https:/ /twitte r.com/S yriaDM/ status/ 9736683 2422688 3585
https:/ /twitte r.com/s narwani /status /973661 8663953 61280
or maybe you have perused the KAL007 flight and decided the nice Wikipedia take
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Korea n_Air_L ines_Fl ight_00 7#Passe nger_pa in_and_ sufferi ng
or maybe the "The US President, Ronald Reagan, then launched into a script which must have been prepared in advance in case the Korean Air intruder was shot down, feigning outrage and claiming "the Russians" had knowingly "murdered the passengers in cold blood" although the US were fully aware from their intercepted radio calls between the Russian pilots and ground control that the Russian believed the intruder was an RC-135. A huge propaganda campaign, obviously prepared well in advance, went into full swing to demonize "the heartless communists" for "murdering innocent women and children" in the comments seems more plausible
https:/ /www.ws ws.org/ en/arti cles/20 18/01/1 6/pers- j16.htm l
or do you believe everything you are told like 'a good boy'
And, i am bound to say, that that would probably not be enough for you, because there's nothing like hard evidence to kill an overactive imagination stone dead :-) "
Ah, so we have The Holy Cloak of National Security - Need to Know? - being drawn this time not by the State, but one willing minion,and The Holy Cloak of Satire by another.
Is this suitable evidence Peter-P
https:/
https:/
or maybe you have perused the KAL007 flight and decided the nice Wikipedia take
https:/
or maybe the "The US President, Ronald Reagan, then launched into a script which must have been prepared in advance in case the Korean Air intruder was shot down, feigning outrage and claiming "the Russians" had knowingly "murdered the passengers in cold blood" although the US were fully aware from their intercepted radio calls between the Russian pilots and ground control that the Russian believed the intruder was an RC-135. A huge propaganda campaign, obviously prepared well in advance, went into full swing to demonize "the heartless communists" for "murdering innocent women and children" in the comments seems more plausible
https:/
or do you believe everything you are told like 'a good boy'