Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Not Quite 'rivers Of Blood' But A London Hospital's Floor Covered In Blood?
43 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Which hospital is he referring to?
And how were the hospitals in Las Vegas after the 500 there were injured and 58 deaths when Stephen Paddock decided to open fire?
Should we really be listening to the president who doesn’t even know where the latest attack in America happens, possibly because these are such regular occurancies now?
https:/ /www.cb snews.c om/news /trump- tweets- condole nces-to -wrong- town-af ter-mas s-shoot ing/
And how were the hospitals in Las Vegas after the 500 there were injured and 58 deaths when Stephen Paddock decided to open fire?
Should we really be listening to the president who doesn’t even know where the latest attack in America happens, possibly because these are such regular occurancies now?
https:/
This is where we miss mikey..........;-)
Where else other than an abattoir would you find "rivers of blood" than in a hospital?
However, I have a certain amount of sympathy for the words of President Trump as knife crime is becoming "endemic" in London.
Given the choice, I think that i would rather be shot than stabbed.
Where else other than an abattoir would you find "rivers of blood" than in a hospital?
However, I have a certain amount of sympathy for the words of President Trump as knife crime is becoming "endemic" in London.
Given the choice, I think that i would rather be shot than stabbed.
I have yet to see the day when there is a 'multi knifing' and many people are killed in one incident by the same person. It happens all the time with guns in Trump's USA. With anything Trump says you need to remember that he is VERY pro Guns and the NRA. His brother is the NRA official spokesperson. ( I wonder why he got the job?)
I don't know about 'Not quite rivers of blood' - it has absolutely nothing to do with rivers of blood.
If the president is trying to say that America is better of with its gun crime statistics than our knife crime statistics, it seems a seriously poorly thought out and pointless position to take.
Why not say - would you rather be thrown off a cliff and hit the ground two minutes later, or be torn to pieces by wild birds in thirty seconds on the way down
If the President wants to convince us of his grasp of UK crime, and comparisons with US crime, he needs to pick seriously more solid ground, and do some homework first.
If the president is trying to say that America is better of with its gun crime statistics than our knife crime statistics, it seems a seriously poorly thought out and pointless position to take.
Why not say - would you rather be thrown off a cliff and hit the ground two minutes later, or be torn to pieces by wild birds in thirty seconds on the way down
If the President wants to convince us of his grasp of UK crime, and comparisons with US crime, he needs to pick seriously more solid ground, and do some homework first.
YMB - Indeed it is.
All the President has to say is something along the lines of "Guns are fabulous, I think it should be compulsory for everyone to have at least three of them ..." and that's his job done.
If he thinks the NRA are even vaguely interested in knife crime in the UK, then he rather overestimates the civic values of his audience.
All the President has to say is something along the lines of "Guns are fabulous, I think it should be compulsory for everyone to have at least three of them ..." and that's his job done.
If he thinks the NRA are even vaguely interested in knife crime in the UK, then he rather overestimates the civic values of his audience.
It rather looks like you have not listened to the speach.
He was trying to justify the carrying of weapons and saying if people had a gun this would not have happened. He then went on to say we have the toughest guns law but it hasn't stopped killings.
It's all rot of course but like I say, context is everything.
He was trying to justify the carrying of weapons and saying if people had a gun this would not have happened. He then went on to say we have the toughest guns law but it hasn't stopped killings.
It's all rot of course but like I say, context is everything.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.