Shopping & Style1 min ago
Can We Now Discuss This Case?
266 Answers
ABSpareEditor
I don't know if this was the story that we can't debate on, but according to the Daily Mail reporting restrictions were lifted this afternoon.
I don't know if this was the story that we can't debate on, but according to the Daily Mail reporting restrictions were lifted this afternoon.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
//He's now where all savages like him should be. (I believe that is the in term on AB for lawbreakers.)//
Some people on AB are more discriminating when deploying words like "savage". Like they can distinguish between the law-beaker who rapes a twelve year old girl and the law-breaker who parks on a double yellow line.
Decent man and Garaman would agree on that, yes?
Some people on AB are more discriminating when deploying words like "savage". Like they can distinguish between the law-beaker who rapes a twelve year old girl and the law-breaker who parks on a double yellow line.
Decent man and Garaman would agree on that, yes?
I am sure 'some' are, VE, but it was made the 'in' term on AB after being used to describe someone who committed fraud, who just happened to be black. I certainly wouldn't call a person who commits fraud a savage, but we are told it is the 'in' joke.
On, Tommy Robinson, truth is I can't make up my mind. I have watched a lot of his videos, and want to dislike him if I am honest, but find myself agreeing with much of what he says. However, I don't support anyone putting a trial like this in jeopardy, and for that he is an idiot who deserved to be locked up.
On, Tommy Robinson, truth is I can't make up my mind. I have watched a lot of his videos, and want to dislike him if I am honest, but find myself agreeing with much of what he says. However, I don't support anyone putting a trial like this in jeopardy, and for that he is an idiot who deserved to be locked up.
I'm delightfully surprised by your post, Garaman.
I'm contemptuous of this putting "a trial like this in jeopardy" rationalisation. If the problem had been acknowledged and attended to twenty years ago there wouldn't have been a BNP or a Robinson "taking advantage of... in order to pursue their sinister agenda etc etc".
The way to stop "far-right" groups exploiting mass rapes for political advantage is to... bang up far-right groups under hate speech laws?
Correction, the way to stop "far-right" groups exploiting mass rapes is to stop mass rapes.
I'm contemptuous of this putting "a trial like this in jeopardy" rationalisation. If the problem had been acknowledged and attended to twenty years ago there wouldn't have been a BNP or a Robinson "taking advantage of... in order to pursue their sinister agenda etc etc".
The way to stop "far-right" groups exploiting mass rapes for political advantage is to... bang up far-right groups under hate speech laws?
Correction, the way to stop "far-right" groups exploiting mass rapes is to stop mass rapes.
I get carried away from time to time.
I do hope that my last two posts haven't broken any Site Rules.
I do hope that my last two posts haven't broken any Site Rules.
//I don't support anyone putting a trial like this in jeopardy, and for that he is an idiot who deserved to be locked up//
It was the last day of the trial, so...no jeopardy.
However, he was stupid for being there, knowing from past experience that our politicised and partisan police were out to get him.
It was the last day of the trial, so...no jeopardy.
However, he was stupid for being there, knowing from past experience that our politicised and partisan police were out to get him.
Plod and the judiciary seem able to invoke either blanket ban on publicity(in the name of justice), or to whip up a media storm of publicity, led by the Beep Beep See,( in the name of justice) according to how the different cases fit their political agenda. Perhaps it is ok to tout for witnesses to, sometimes non existent, crimes in the newspapers and news "bulletins". But woe betide anyone who dares to highlight real crime that was covered up for decades by plod and the justice system themselves. Perhaps the people who were jailed in some of our highly publicised recent cases have grounds for appeal because they did not get an unbiased trial? Or is that different?
It's other people, with similarly inflated opinions of their own importance, leaping to the defence of this idiot with their notions of 'suppression of free speech' and similar twaddle, that allows him to have a platform for his constant attention-seeking.
It's interesting how the only people who are publicly defending 'Tommy Robinson' are attention-seekers similar to him.
It's interesting how the only people who are publicly defending 'Tommy Robinson' are attention-seekers similar to him.
fiction factory - // " In protest at felons abusing youngsters they consider 'easy meat' I no longer use asian services & retail outlets. "
Yes, tambo, i can see you feel mayybe they are all in it together.
Does your boycott include Asian doctors and Nurses? //
On the basis that, statistically, more children are abused and murdered by white people in this country, I have decided to no longer use 'white' services and retail outlets.
I expect to starve to death long before my pointless gesture is recognised for the nonsense that it is.
Yes, tambo, i can see you feel mayybe they are all in it together.
Does your boycott include Asian doctors and Nurses? //
On the basis that, statistically, more children are abused and murdered by white people in this country, I have decided to no longer use 'white' services and retail outlets.
I expect to starve to death long before my pointless gesture is recognised for the nonsense that it is.
Barmaid, a question.
(I happily concede, by the way, that Mr Robinson breached the terms of his suspended sentence.)
From your own experience (is that in criminal law, by the way?) do you think seven cops and a paddy wagon rolling up and arresting Robinson for a "breach of peace" is normal?
Wasn't there, seen nothing, but can imagine a scenario where
the police stand by watching, Robinson rants, harasses defendants entering court and police: say enough of that we're banging you up.
But the seven cops and the paddy wagon could suggest another interpretation - like some éminence grise has said "Ah, my lucky day, Robinson's poked his head above the parapet, our chance to get him."
Give me an honest answer, Barmaid. How do you read the circumstances of his arrest?
(I happily concede, by the way, that Mr Robinson breached the terms of his suspended sentence.)
From your own experience (is that in criminal law, by the way?) do you think seven cops and a paddy wagon rolling up and arresting Robinson for a "breach of peace" is normal?
Wasn't there, seen nothing, but can imagine a scenario where
the police stand by watching, Robinson rants, harasses defendants entering court and police: say enough of that we're banging you up.
But the seven cops and the paddy wagon could suggest another interpretation - like some éminence grise has said "Ah, my lucky day, Robinson's poked his head above the parapet, our chance to get him."
Give me an honest answer, Barmaid. How do you read the circumstances of his arrest?
