There, Now Can We Move On?

[douglas9401]

Seems the dodging the ambulance theory may be a bit off.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-45180120

[Rockrose]

So now that they have named him it does in one aspect proof an ABer wrong who suggested the guys name would be Mohammed.

[Rockrose]

Lol no its not Spath but it aint Mohammed either.

[naomi24]

spath,//13 Islamist plots and four far-right plots had been foiled."

Seems it's more than 1/4 of attacks are from the far right... //

You really ... really .... need to re-think that. They're talking about foiled plots.

[anotheoldgit]

Rockrose

/// So now that they have named him it does in one aspect proof an ABer wrong who suggested the guys name would be Mohammed. ///

I did not suggest that his name would be Mohammed. This is what I really said:

"Do you think his first name 'MIGHT' be Mohammed"?

Because we didn't know his name at that time, but were almost convinced that he would be a Muslim.

[naomi24]

No spath. These are foiled plots. The security services could have foiled more or fewer from either side - but those figures have no bearing whatsoever on the number of attacks that succeed.

[anotheoldgit]

Must be very hard for the liberal thinkers, when the results of their liberal thinking comes back to kick them in the teeth.

[Rockrose]

not at all anotheroldgit - I have yet to see anyone get a kick in the teeth.

[ToraToraTora]

spath, have you ever heard of Occam's razor? and no it's not a Gillette competitor!

[naomi24]

Spath, you don’t need knowledge of the topic to understand that, whoever is doing the planning, we can’t gauge the number of attacks being plotted by the number foiled. Your logic is awry.

//simply saying he's a Islamic terrorist isn't a solution, nor is it that simple.//

It isn’t a solution … but it is that simple.

[naomi24]

spath, //Seems it's more than 1/4 of attacks are from the far right... //

That's^ what you said. That's incorrect. We'll leave it there.

[andy-hughes]

AOG - // Because we didn't know his name at that time, but were almost convinced that he would be a Muslim. //

I am not sure who 'we' are, or what convinced 'us' that he would be a Muslim other than deeply incised lines of pre-existing predjudice.


Obviously you speak for yourself, but you need to clarify who 'we' are - it will save me the job if distancing myself from your viewpoint.