Quizzes & Puzzles5 mins ago
Why Has This Taken 9 Years To Come Out?
171 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.> I dislike the notion bandied about on here that because she was paid off afterwards she wasn't raped
I think the notion is that, even if she was raped, the moment she accepted a huge payoff and chose not to press charges she stopped being a rape victim and became instead the gold digger which, if she wasn't raped, she had been all along. It's impossible to prove rape one way or the other now, but this opinion-based logic would make it moot.
I think the notion is that, even if she was raped, the moment she accepted a huge payoff and chose not to press charges she stopped being a rape victim and became instead the gold digger which, if she wasn't raped, she had been all along. It's impossible to prove rape one way or the other now, but this opinion-based logic would make it moot.
// The rich and powerful are apparently protected from any accusations because .... //
they can hire very expensive lawyers to muddy the waters
why has she kept her mouth zipped up for 9 y ?
I am certain 3T would comment 'how unlike a woman'
If I said - I was robbed/broken into 10 y ago but didnt bother to report it to the police
not many people would say - no no in that case it cdnt have taken place!
they can hire very expensive lawyers to muddy the waters
why has she kept her mouth zipped up for 9 y ?
I am certain 3T would comment 'how unlike a woman'
If I said - I was robbed/broken into 10 y ago but didnt bother to report it to the police
not many people would say - no no in that case it cdnt have taken place!
// Doesn't proof have to be established beyond a reasonable doubt?//
there is a certain amount of more blah needed here
The burden of proof is on the crown - they have to show the events occurred
The standard of proof is beyond reasonable doubt
and that is in the minds of the Jury ....
and the blessed Allison Saunders now else where when she was DPP decreed that more cases of "he said, she said" went to trial
and clearly since people are convicted - the jury is persuaded.
Scots law let me say an admission alone is not sufficient
there is a certain amount of more blah needed here
The burden of proof is on the crown - they have to show the events occurred
The standard of proof is beyond reasonable doubt
and that is in the minds of the Jury ....
and the blessed Allison Saunders now else where when she was DPP decreed that more cases of "he said, she said" went to trial
and clearly since people are convicted - the jury is persuaded.
Scots law let me say an admission alone is not sufficient
Spicerack do you think she said:-
' Mwahahahah I've just had consensual sex with you now give me $300,000 or I'll scream rape'
or do you think it went more like this:-
'You raped me, you raped me I'm going to the police.'
'Nooooo no no no no no, don't do that, I'm sorry I'm such a nice guy normally I don't know whatever came over me,it'll never happen again, I'm so sorry here let me at least give you something to make your life easier $300,000, but please don't say anything it would ruin me and i didn't mean it.'
I mean seriously which seems more probable?
' Mwahahahah I've just had consensual sex with you now give me $300,000 or I'll scream rape'
or do you think it went more like this:-
'You raped me, you raped me I'm going to the police.'
'Nooooo no no no no no, don't do that, I'm sorry I'm such a nice guy normally I don't know whatever came over me,it'll never happen again, I'm so sorry here let me at least give you something to make your life easier $300,000, but please don't say anything it would ruin me and i didn't mean it.'
I mean seriously which seems more probable?
In a perverse way I hope this does go to trial. I'd love to see the prosecution prove beyond all reasonable doubt that Ronaldo raped a woman 9 years ago without a single shred of evidence, a woman who accepted money not to go public. By any reasonable objective point of view it just doesn't stand up to scrutiny. But I'm bad for thinking that and should just accept she's telling the truth.
I find that odd.
I find that odd.