Tommy Robinson

[spathiphyllum]

Tommy Robinson has had his facebook and instagram account terminated. Facebook says he has continually violated its community standards with hate speech against Muslims.

Is you use social media in ways that violate their policies around organised hate then surely you're a bad person?

[Togo]

I see that Raheem Kassam has had his Faeces Bunk account reinstated after Trump highlighted it.

“Multicultural societies have only functioned peacefully in authoritarian states."

Helmut Schmidt.

[andy-hughes]

sanmac - // Make you really wonder why one is removed and one allowed to stay. //

It is difficult to comment because we cannot compare what 'Tommy Robinson' posted because it has been removed.

I would suggest - based on an assumption obviously - that in the eyes of the legal watchdogs at Facebook, Mr Chouderay is savvy enough to sail close to the wind in legal terms, but not sufficiently close to require warning about his posts, and then subsequent termination of his account.

I would also suggest - again an assumption - that 'Tommy Robinson' has got a little too carried away with his self-righteousness, and allowed it to colour his written views, thus falling foul of Facebook regulations.

[dreamer56]

Why is there a flag comparing the EU to CCCP?
We are/were a member with a veto on any rules or laws they decided on. It's just that once we agreed to the rules- you know, terrible things like clean beaches, protection for local produce like Cheddar Cheese for example- the Mail and Express magnified the moans relentlessly for decades. The European council was no bigger than a local authority. There are no gulags, forced imprisonments etc etc. we are now embarked on a fruitless waste of inrellectual energy to leave the best, most civilised bloc of nations ever witnessed on this planet. So, please stop using ridiculous imagery like that euccp flag.

[retrocop]

I believe your dreams have slept walked you into the wrong post old fruit. :-)

[andy-hughes]

dreamer - I have reported your post to the Ed, so it can be moved to the correct thread in the morning.

[-Talbot-]

andy hughes
As has been advised, the evidence will have been removed by Facebook, we will need someone who actually follows 'Tommy Robinson's guff to advise us what he said - but surprisinlgy even his ardent defenders on here seem unable to come to the aid of the party on that one - maybe they just got bored and zoned out.



You really are clueless.
There are many groups on Facebook that follow every move that Tommy Robinson makes...don't you think it is odd that the internet is not littered with screenshots of what Tommy Robinson has supposedly said and been banned for?

[Theland]

You may think the undemocratic Commission are sufficiently philanthropic to satisfy your aspirations, but they are undemocratic, and their behaviour that you approve of so much, can change, and you will have no way of removing them or influencing any decisions of which you disapprove. Yes?

[andy-hughes]

Talbot - // You really are clueless.
There are many groups on Facebook that follow every move that Tommy Robinson makes...don't you think it is odd that the internet is not littered with screenshots of what Tommy Robinson has supposedly said and been banned for? //

First of all, there is no need to be offensive.

But to address your point - I have no idea why 'Tommy's legions of fans are not peppering the Internet with rebuttals of his dreadful and unfair treatment.

It could be that none of them are bright enough to take a screen-shot.

It could be that no-one thinks what he posts is worth keeping for posterity.

It could be that no-one actually cares a jot that he has gone!

Feel free to add any thoughts of yours - as you will understand, those are just the ones I thought of as I typed - 'Tommy Robinson is not deserving of any deeper thought on the subject.

[andy-hughes]

Theland - // You may think the undemocratic Commission are sufficiently philanthropic to satisfy your aspirations, but they are undemocratic, and their behaviour that you approve of so much, can change, and you will have no way of removing them or influencing any decisions of which you disapprove. Yes? //

The post to which you are replying is on the wrong thread - I have reported it for re-location in the morning, and I am doing the same for yours - hopefully you can pick it up in its correct location.

[-Talbot-]

Saying you are clueless when clearly you are clueless is not offensive.
Your reply @ 20:30 confirms what I have said.


//But to address your point - I have no idea why 'Tommy's legions of fans are not peppering the Internet with rebuttals of his dreadful and unfair treatment.//


You haven't addressed my point.
It is Tommy Robinson's detractors that you would expect to be littering the WWW with his hate posts...where are they?

[Togo]

^^ Does Hezbollah still have Faecesbook and Tw*tter accounts?

[Togo]

I wonder is Clegg has anything to do with it? Strike a deal with the Beep Beep See on the basis that we will shadow ban TR if you promise not to criticise us for allowing the child abusers free reign?

[Togo]

"BBC contributor Mohammed Shafiq acknowledged contacting Faebook to discuss Robinson's pages "and their impact in brainwashing his supporters to become terrorist and use violence against Muslims."

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-26/tommy-robinson-upstages-radical-far-left-bbc-hit-piece-gets-permanent-facebook-ban

[andy-hughes]

Talbot - // You haven't addressed my point.
It is Tommy Robinson's detractors that you would expect to be littering the WWW with his hate posts...where are they? //

I have absolutely no idea, and I care even less.

Probably my fellow detractors feel the same!!

'Tommy Robinson' has been removed from Facebook, who on earth would want to perpetuate his vile nonsense by posting it elsewhere?

I think that is self-evident - but I would dream of calling you 'clueless' because you haven't worked it out for yourself.

[andy-hughes]

Togo - // I wonder is Clegg has anything to do with it? Strike a deal with the Beep Beep See on the basis that we will shadow ban TR if you promise not to criticise us for allowing the child abusers free reign? //

That is reaching - even for you!!

[-Talbot-]

andy hughes
Talbot - // You haven't addressed my point.
It is Tommy Robinson's detractors that you would expect to be littering the WWW with his hate posts...where are they? //

I have absolutely no idea, and I care even less.





Why on earth have you bothered with the debate then?

[ichkeria]

Presumably the “hate posts” don’t exist any more because they’ve been ... um ... banned. Another reason might be that it’s not really a good idea to spread this stuff around, even assuming anyone would have collected it. Who knows.
And fear not folks: the EDL Facebook page (“Tommy Robinson should replace Theresa May”) is still there for your delectation :-)

[Togo]

//That is reaching - even for you!!//

See link@20:52. Wise up.

[agchristie]

//"and their impact in brainwashing his supporters to become terrorist and use violence against Muslims."

I wonder what the parameters were to evaluate that was?

[andy-hughes]

Talbot - // Why on earth have you bothered with the debate then? //

Because I enjoy winding up people who defend 'Tommy Robinson' - and I do enjoy exchanging reasonable viewpoints with the rest of the AB community who are not so self-righteous and keen to defend their idol and condemn anyone who doesn't think the sun shines out of him.