Editor's Blog0 min ago
Religious Bigotry 1
LBGT 0
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ educati on/2019 /mar/14 /birmin gham-pr imary-s chool-s uspends -lgbt-l essons- indefin itely-p arkfiel d-prote st-pare nts?CMP =fb_gu
Was there any doubt about the result...stonewall banker wasn't it.
https:/
Was there any doubt about the result...stonewall banker wasn't it.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by -Talbot-. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.At primary level that’s it - relationships, not sex. It will barely be touched upon in the minuscule amount of time that is spent upon the new suggested guidelines. If people just casually brought it up, commented upon same sex relationships, etc then schools wouldn’t have to do it. Increasingly schools are having to take the parental role and it is increasingly *##:)) me off - have kids, bring them up to be decent, open minded people.
Theland, you’re being a fossil. We’re not religious but it’s good that other people are (whatever religion they are), we are all currently straight but it’s fine if that doesn’t float your boat. We’re good with any combination of parents (but probably not cool with any combination over two people/genders, whatever). Leave people be, if they’re good to their kids, like cats and dogs - really, why should anyone give a ***.
It's a toughie, isn't it?
Course materials: "Mama, Momya and me", "King and King".
Are these books in primary schools "promoting" homosexual relationships, or simply describing them and advocating tolerance?
Are the Muslim parents right or wrong when they argue that the point of the "No Outsiders" program is to teach Muslim children that homosexual relationships not only exist and should be tolerated, but that they are equally morally right (which none of the Parkview parents will believe)?
Take another instance: Christian baker refuses to make wedding cake with iced message "support gay marriage".
I'm familiar with the woke AB community and I'd like to ask its members why the second set is guilty of hate crimes and should be prosecuted - and why the first set isn't.
Course materials: "Mama, Momya and me", "King and King".
Are these books in primary schools "promoting" homosexual relationships, or simply describing them and advocating tolerance?
Are the Muslim parents right or wrong when they argue that the point of the "No Outsiders" program is to teach Muslim children that homosexual relationships not only exist and should be tolerated, but that they are equally morally right (which none of the Parkview parents will believe)?
Take another instance: Christian baker refuses to make wedding cake with iced message "support gay marriage".
I'm familiar with the woke AB community and I'd like to ask its members why the second set is guilty of hate crimes and should be prosecuted - and why the first set isn't.
There is an agenda here insofar as the people who are objecting are doing so on religious grounds, and on those grounds objections must be debatable. However, there is also an agenda on the part of the man who instigated this initiative in that his mission in life is to promote LGBT issues – something he is perfectly entitled to do. What he is not entitled to do is to impose his agenda on the innocent minds of primary school children – some as young as four. As a parent with no religious belief, I too would object to his intrusion.