Donate SIGN UP

Why Doesn't This Couple Just Ditch Their Royal Status And Live Out Of The Limelight, As A Self Earning Private Couple?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 11:38 Thu 05th Sep 2019 | News
86 Answers
Gravatar

Answers

61 to 80 of 86rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
//His views were known alright. As a colonel in the Guards Rgt he failed to rejoin his Rgt when mobilised. He just happened to be in France when he got his recall to mobilise. He legged it to the Bahamas I think with Simpson. Any one else on active duty would of been shot.//

Thanks, I never knew that. Ran in the family, if the rumours about Prince George's death in '42 are true.
Harry had a distinguish career in the the British Army.
He served in the Army for ten years, rising to the rank of Captain and undertaking two tours of active service in Afghanistan. He continues to work in support of his fellow servicemen, promoting support for wounded men and women as they adapt to life post-injury.

He did not do minimal conscripted service in the RAF after hostilities had ended.

You are a disgrace to even criticise him.
I see that your thread has been diverted once again A.O.Gent. Diverted it would seem by those who can usually be relied upon to be passionately anti Royalist, Republican, Marxists,(take your pick) but somehow find themselves born again fervent supporters of all things involving courtiers when the new and exciting Meghan is involved. Too young to go to Balmoral, but not too young to go to Ibiza, or to join the other queen on his yacht in the south of France, or to be packing his dummy for a trip to South Africa later this month. This is a car crash waiting to happen.
Look away, nothing to see here. Yet MORE Royal gibberish.
All this Harry and Meghan bashing is so tedious. I don't read any of it as it's not of any interest to me.
The Duke didn't "[leg] it to The Bahamas", he was appointed as its Governor.
To address your OP AOG I have often wondered the same myself.

It would seem that lifestyle would suit them better (pun intended) so I dont see why they dont do it. Perhaps they will, hasn't she/they just bought a gaff out there?
Despite the touching "concern" for baby Archie and his vulnerable first month of life it appears that Meghan has flown to the States to watch her mate Serena Williams in the US open tennis final. Without Harry or the baby but with her security "team". Perhaps that explains why the Balmoral visit was snubbed.
They didn’t go last year either.
Perhaps they don’t like it.
Wonder what last years excuse was....with no baby to hide behind?
She was in early pregnancy .
Early stages of pregnancy.....Haha. Reminds me of the woman who insisted on special treatment because she was pregnant and when asked how long she had been so said...... 20 minutes.
From op link
//The Duke and Duchess of Sussex could not attend last year as Meghan was in the late stages of pregnancy.//
Blimey she must be special. Her gestation period must be something like an elephant's considering the child was born 6th May and Her Majesty is in Balmoral during the summer. All of 8 months or so before the birth.
Yawn - young married couple with a baby. Are they not allowed to decide anything? Would you say the same about the other hangers-on AOG? Randy Andy and his entourage - Edward and his family. Yes, they are royals but what exactly do they do? If we must have a monarchy then just accept it - personally would vote for a republic.
To return to your OP Question AOG -

Why should they? The couple are where they are by virtue of an accident of birth, and a marriage, that hardly counts as compelling reasons why they should simply abandon their family and shuffle off into obscurity because a national newspaper has its claws into them.

They see themselves as being able to highlight good causes, and do some good in he world, and there's nothing wrong with that.

Their use of private transport while talking about conservation is, in my view, misjudged, but if it's not that, it will be something else - the Royals irritate someone somewhere just by breathing, so I am sure they are used to ignoring all that by now.
Would ditching their titles prevent the tabloids reporting everything they do? I'm not sure they can stop it, even if they wanted to.
When push comes to shove, what does it matter to us what they do? Cant someone explain why people feel such anger and resentment towards them?
Can*
TCL
//The Duke didn't "[leg] it to The Bahamas", he was appointed as its Governor.//

Course he was . He was bought back to Blighty in disgrace on HMS Kelly (Mountbatten's ship) after failing to rejoin his regiment. He was then packed orf to the Bahamas before he caused further embarrassment. Sir Winston Churchill demanded he be Court Martialled.
Our totally racist Edward V111 and no doubt anti-semite mailed his two best buddies, Adolf Hitler and Herman Goering whilst in virtual exile as Govenor of Bahamas and kindly requested if they would keep an eye on his properties in France. (Seeing as they had just invaded it)

61 to 80 of 86rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Why Doesn't This Couple Just Ditch Their Royal Status And Live Out Of The Limelight, As A Self Earning Private Couple?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.