Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
Prince William And Wife Kate Meet Imran Khan, Pakistan's Pm And Friend Of Diana
71 Answers
I apologise for there not being a link, but it seems that I can no longer copy and paste links on my phone.
The question I wish to ask is why did Kate choose to wear typical Pakistan dress, when their dignities don't return the same respect by dressing in western clothes when visiting our shores?
The question I wish to ask is why did Kate choose to wear typical Pakistan dress, when their dignities don't return the same respect by dressing in western clothes when visiting our shores?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think it's a totally valid question by AOG and absolutely nothing to do with how pretty she is or how smart she is. It's not that it's polite for a woman to dress with arms and legs covered in muslim countries - it's more an offence not to. And yes absolutely does it come under cultural appropriation the way ABers (well Jim specifically) has taught me to interpret that phrase. We don't get the same respect because we don't ask or expect it - people can wear what they like.
ummmm - // Yes, Andy, I was thinking Malta. It was my shoulders that needed to be covered. //
Indeed - I have been to Malta, and seen ladies refused entry to churches because they were not dressed appropriately.
// It was the same visiting temples in Thailand. They do make allowances for the tourists' attire but the shoulders have to be covered. //
Once again, I believe it is polite to observe cultural traditions in other countries, even if they appear unusual or odd to us.
Not showing the soles of the feet in Thailand is a prime example - no-one would bat an eyelid here, but in Thailand it's considered extremely offensive.
Indeed - I have been to Malta, and seen ladies refused entry to churches because they were not dressed appropriately.
// It was the same visiting temples in Thailand. They do make allowances for the tourists' attire but the shoulders have to be covered. //
Once again, I believe it is polite to observe cultural traditions in other countries, even if they appear unusual or odd to us.
Not showing the soles of the feet in Thailand is a prime example - no-one would bat an eyelid here, but in Thailand it's considered extremely offensive.
Prudie - // And yes absolutely does it come under cultural appropriation the way ABers (well Jim specifically) has taught me to interpret that phrase. We don't get the same respect because we don't ask or expect it - people can wear what they like. //
The term 'cultural appropriation' is a nonsensical media expression dreamed up so people can feel precious about defending other cultures which have no need of it, in order to make themselves increase their need for self-righteousness when jawing away in their local Coasta.
The term 'cultural appropriation' is a nonsensical media expression dreamed up so people can feel precious about defending other cultures which have no need of it, in order to make themselves increase their need for self-righteousness when jawing away in their local Coasta.
Douglas - // A bit like the 'so' rule then. //
Not at all.
One is media luvvies making up nonsensical expressions to appeal to people with an over-developed and futile sense of self-worth and value to the world around them.
The other is light-hearted jibe at people who read something on here, respond to something other than what they have read, and then criticise the originator for being wrong, based on their version of what he or she has said, which actually bears no resemblance to it whatsoever.
There is no common ground here at all, but thanks for your input.
Not at all.
One is media luvvies making up nonsensical expressions to appeal to people with an over-developed and futile sense of self-worth and value to the world around them.
The other is light-hearted jibe at people who read something on here, respond to something other than what they have read, and then criticise the originator for being wrong, based on their version of what he or she has said, which actually bears no resemblance to it whatsoever.
There is no common ground here at all, but thanks for your input.
Andy hughes
/// I think they are - they are the next generation of the Royal Family, and they are adapting to changes in the world in which they live, which is appropriate in my view. ///
Perhaps you are prepared to accept the erosion of the culture and traditions of this once great country but I am not, especially when it seems that we are the only country that is prepared to do so, while other countries are not prepared to give up theirs, and people like you honour them for it.
/// I think they are - they are the next generation of the Royal Family, and they are adapting to changes in the world in which they live, which is appropriate in my view. ///
Perhaps you are prepared to accept the erosion of the culture and traditions of this once great country but I am not, especially when it seems that we are the only country that is prepared to do so, while other countries are not prepared to give up theirs, and people like you honour them for it.
AOG - // Andy hughes
/// I think they are - they are the next generation of the Royal Family, and they are adapting to changes in the world in which they live, which is appropriate in my view. ///
Perhaps you are prepared to accept the erosion of the culture and traditions of this once great country but I am not, especially when it seems that we are the only country that is prepared to do so, while other countries are not prepared to give up theirs, and people like you honour them for it. //
First of all, you are making a completely unfounded assumption that I am prepared to accept the erosion of the culture and traditions of this country, when I have suggested no such thing.
Secondly you assume that other countries are not prepared to give up theirs, which is based on nothing stated by me.
Thirdly you assume that I am 'honouring them for it' - I am not sure whom I am supposed to be 'honouring', or for what, since again it is based on nothing I have said.
Not for the first time, you are deducing nonsense from your own imagination and attributing it to something you imagine I think, or have said, and not for the first time, you are completely wrong on both counts.
/// I think they are - they are the next generation of the Royal Family, and they are adapting to changes in the world in which they live, which is appropriate in my view. ///
Perhaps you are prepared to accept the erosion of the culture and traditions of this once great country but I am not, especially when it seems that we are the only country that is prepared to do so, while other countries are not prepared to give up theirs, and people like you honour them for it. //
First of all, you are making a completely unfounded assumption that I am prepared to accept the erosion of the culture and traditions of this country, when I have suggested no such thing.
Secondly you assume that other countries are not prepared to give up theirs, which is based on nothing stated by me.
Thirdly you assume that I am 'honouring them for it' - I am not sure whom I am supposed to be 'honouring', or for what, since again it is based on nothing I have said.
Not for the first time, you are deducing nonsense from your own imagination and attributing it to something you imagine I think, or have said, and not for the first time, you are completely wrong on both counts.
andy-hughes
/// First of all, you are making a completely unfounded assumption that I am prepared to accept the erosion of the culture and traditions of this country, when I have suggested no such thing. ///
Correct me if I am wrong but wasn't it you who put:
/// "I think they are - they are the next generation of the Royal Family, and they are adapting to changes in the world in which they live, which is appropriate in my view" ///.
I take this as meaning that you are in favor of the changes that the young Royals are making to the centuries old culture and traditions of our Royal Family.
/// First of all, you are making a completely unfounded assumption that I am prepared to accept the erosion of the culture and traditions of this country, when I have suggested no such thing. ///
Correct me if I am wrong but wasn't it you who put:
/// "I think they are - they are the next generation of the Royal Family, and they are adapting to changes in the world in which they live, which is appropriate in my view" ///.
I take this as meaning that you are in favor of the changes that the young Royals are making to the centuries old culture and traditions of our Royal Family.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.