Road rules2 mins ago
Prince Andrew
139 Answers
Breaking news Prince Andrew to step back from public duties.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Prince Andrew: Duke 'wants to do another interview on Jeffrey Epstein to show remorse'
https:/ /www.ms n.com/e n-gb/ne ws/ukne ws/prin ce-andr ew-duke -wants- to-do-a nother- intervi ew-on-j effrey- epstein -to-sho w-remor se/ar-B BX3bR0? li=BBoP WjQ
https:/
He is reputed To flit from golf course to golf course. By helicopter / jet / hot air balloon etc at not his expense.
But he has compromised, I think, his honesty / integrity.
I feel sorry for him now as his conscience will torment him.
That is the worst thing to happen to happen to him, and I hope the gleeful critics will back off now.
Who is perfect? None of us, sadly.
But he has compromised, I think, his honesty / integrity.
I feel sorry for him now as his conscience will torment him.
That is the worst thing to happen to happen to him, and I hope the gleeful critics will back off now.
Who is perfect? None of us, sadly.
//as his conscience will torment him//
I dont think it will because I am not convinced he has one.
I've not seen the whole thing, only bits, but what bits I saw were toe curling. I have no idea what REALLY happened between him/Epstein/Virginia Guiffree Roberts. Until he did this interview, I had a bit of sympathy for him. But his utter lack of empathy and his arrogance in "I am a member of the Royal family so all I need to do is have a chat with the BBC and the british public are going to be so gullible........" is just mind blowing. He'd have done better to say nothing. Or if he must say something at least say something humble and believable.
Tbh, I think he was as much used as he used others. That doesnt make it right or fair. He just should have kept his trap shut. Lets face it,previous royal interviews havent gone well, have they?!
I dont think it will because I am not convinced he has one.
I've not seen the whole thing, only bits, but what bits I saw were toe curling. I have no idea what REALLY happened between him/Epstein/Virginia Guiffree Roberts. Until he did this interview, I had a bit of sympathy for him. But his utter lack of empathy and his arrogance in "I am a member of the Royal family so all I need to do is have a chat with the BBC and the british public are going to be so gullible........" is just mind blowing. He'd have done better to say nothing. Or if he must say something at least say something humble and believable.
Tbh, I think he was as much used as he used others. That doesnt make it right or fair. He just should have kept his trap shut. Lets face it,previous royal interviews havent gone well, have they?!
// So then, if a member of the Public had been accused of the same offence,//
erm let us recap - andie - randy tho he may be
has not been accused let alone indicted for any crime
and if it were a possibility - then he cd take the fifth both sides of the Atlantic.
kissing a 17 y old is NOT against the law in this country
( which means he cdnt be extradited).or all the men in Rotherham would be in jail
oh oops most of them are ....my bad
erm let us recap - andie - randy tho he may be
has not been accused let alone indicted for any crime
and if it were a possibility - then he cd take the fifth both sides of the Atlantic.
kissing a 17 y old is NOT against the law in this country
( which means he cdnt be extradited).or all the men in Rotherham would be in jail
oh oops most of them are ....my bad