ChatterBank9 mins ago
Most Embarrassing Moment Of Elections So Far.
BBC2 politics live today with Andrew Neil.
Most embarrassing moment in the savaging of Liz Truss.
Discussing housing, Andrew asked Liz Truss how many of the 2,500 starter homes have been built since the promise 4 years ago.
Liz Truss replied she didn't have the exact figures with her at the moment.
Andrew replies it is not a hard figure to remember. Zero!
Silence!!!
Most embarrassing moment in the savaging of Liz Truss.
Discussing housing, Andrew asked Liz Truss how many of the 2,500 starter homes have been built since the promise 4 years ago.
Liz Truss replied she didn't have the exact figures with her at the moment.
Andrew replies it is not a hard figure to remember. Zero!
Silence!!!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by needawin. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ."And there are plenty more from Labour with regard to the Magic money forest" @ 13.17
We keep hearing all of this about how Labour can afford this, that or the other, as though the Tories never, ever get into debt and never borrow money for govt purposes. The Tories borrow money left right and centre. It's how it works isn't? Use someone elses money?
We keep hearing all of this about how Labour can afford this, that or the other, as though the Tories never, ever get into debt and never borrow money for govt purposes. The Tories borrow money left right and centre. It's how it works isn't? Use someone elses money?
If a glorified garden shed with some bricks around it can command £435K the somebody needs to have a look at the gouging profiteers getting immensly rich off this scam.
It might also help if the grinning inanities on the telly going on about 'forever homes', 'views' 'space' and location were culled to help get some sort of perspective on the commodity being traded.
It might also help if the grinning inanities on the telly going on about 'forever homes', 'views' 'space' and location were culled to help get some sort of perspective on the commodity being traded.
Surely if a development was built because it was "affordable" and that was needed because insufficient "affordable" housing exists in the area, one assumes it is newly built for those who struggle to afford buying an existing dwelling because they're just starting ? If sufficient already existed for starters, more wouldn't need to be built. Each area needs to figure out what it needs to run properly.
"Are you seriously suggesting that they give up a job, give up their family/relations etc to move many miles away where housing is cheaper?"
err, I did.
Granted it was a few years ago, more than a few actually, but I had to move from Petts Wood, which for those that don't know is a pretty affluent suburb of Bromley on the Kent/SE London border, to a flat
on Loampit Vale in Lewisham, because that was all I could afford.
Lewisham, in the 90s, was pretty bloody grim.
err, I did.
Granted it was a few years ago, more than a few actually, but I had to move from Petts Wood, which for those that don't know is a pretty affluent suburb of Bromley on the Kent/SE London border, to a flat
on Loampit Vale in Lewisham, because that was all I could afford.
Lewisham, in the 90s, was pretty bloody grim.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.