Mozz - // //I hope it is. It's better than being true//
True. I hope its just a big misunderstanding. //
This does highlight the problem of being 'Tommy Robinson'.
A parent with his daughter in a swimming pool observes someone brushing accidentally against his daughter, and may speak to the man about it.
'Tommy Robinson' has to assault the man, and get arrested for it.
Because he is 'Tommy Robinson', the media are all over it like a rash, so the sensible thing to do is to say nothing to anyone until the situation is sorted out and the truth is reported. Either way, his daughter is, at best the subject of unpleasant media attention courtesy of her father's chosen method of making money, at worst the victim of a sexual assault.
Either way, she needs some comfort and support and privacy - what she does not need is her identity splashed all over the internet by some idiot reporter more keen to get a 'story' out there than to protect an innocent traumatised child.
Fortunately, the Press Code Of Conduct prevents any media from intruding into this child's life purely in the interest of spinning a story that may yet be the cause of legal action.
Sadly 'citizen journalists' (snigger) are not bound by such legal, or indeed moral codes of conduct, so any one of those bottom-feeders can carry on and expose this child's identity and trauma to the world at large.
You would expect a loving father to do anything and everything to protect his daughter from such a gross invasion of her young life, wouldn't you?
But if her father is 'Tommy Robinson' - not only does he not do that, he plays the 'citizen journalist' himself and traumatises her even further in pursuit of his own self-aggrandisement and ego-polishing
The man is beneath contempt.