Donate SIGN UP

Answers

101 to 120 of 290rss feed

First Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next Last

Avatar Image
I wouldn't depend on the tabloids to report the truth.... especially when they're on the warpath against someone.
00:15 Tue 03rd Mar 2020
ummmm - // What's with the smiley winking faces when you're insulting someone? //

To whom is that addressed please?
Of course AH.

Have you ever read back through your posts?
//I wonder if this was someone other than Tommy those condemning him would still feel the same. //

Good question, LB.
ladybirder - // … there's a bit of a ruck which I can understand (not being perfect like some) and who gets arrested? Not the one who committed the far worse crime. //

I am not aware that the alleged offender was not arrested - only that it is not as newsworthy as 'Tommy Robinson' - so it's not a case of excusing one piece of bad behaviour because another piece of bad behaviour is worse, that is a dubious piece of reasoning which is often used.

// If it had happened to my little daughter and he denied I'd have punched him as well. I wonder if this was someone other than Tommy those condemning him would still feel the same. //

Honestly, objectively I like to think I wouldn't do that, but in the heat of the moment, I may have behaved in exactly the same way.

What I would not to however, is prefer filming my daughter's account of what happened for my own internet sit - I like to think I would be comforting her and trying to help her through her feelings - but then, I'm not 'Tommy Robinson' - thank God!!!
YMB - // Of course AH. //

Sorry - 'Of course' what please?

// Have you ever read back through your posts? //

Occasionally, but I usually rely on others on here to do that for me!!

There seem to be plenty of them who are willing to go back years, or remember what I have said, which is simultaneously flattering and creepy!
naomi - // /I wonder if this was someone other than Tommy those condemning him would still feel the same. //

Good question, LB. //

It is a good question.

I would like to think I would react in the same way if it were anyone else, but once again 'Tommy Robinson' is hoist by his own petard.

If you create a persona and relentlessly put it in front of people, they are going to develop an attitude to you, be that good or bad, and that will in turn inform your reaction to his ongoing behaviour, which of course is reported, as 'Tommy' would wish, and indeed should expect.
Andy - it was aimed at Naomi.
//Thanks to his relentless self-aggrandisement and desperate need for self-publicity, he is effortlessly a fool to everyone else as well.//

You would need a heart of stone not to laugh........Hi Ronnie.
If this was ever to go to court could the other man's legal team claim that he could not get a fair trial due to the Internet post?
Ladybirder, it is only alleged that the man groped Tommy Robinson's daughter. That said, the attitude of the so-called investigating officers was abysmal.
If I, as an eight year old child, had been sexually groped by a pervert, I know for a fact that my Dad would have acted exactly as Tommy did. And my Mum and the rest of the family would have applauded him. My Dad was not a thug, he was a good, loving family man who wanted to protect his kids from the horrors of the world. There is only the furore on here because as lb says, it is Tommy Robinson. He's my hero too SK and ignore a-h having a pop, who the hell cares about him ??? I don't ...
Question Author
Andy. At the time the police arrested TR, they hadn't arrested the other man involved. They say so in the video.
As to recording his daughter He constantly records things we wouldn't as a defence against the MSM and the police who tend to make up their own version of events where TR is concerned. If he wasn't arrested, we wouldn't have seen it. (imo)
Question Author
Not sending a good message to TR's daughter (or other victims)
Report a sexual assault and see your father arrested.
Best keep quiet for the sake of diversity.
He was the one who sent the message!

Recording it to use in his defence is one thing - it could then have safely been deployed in Court subject to reporting restrictions. Putting on the www for all to see is quite another.
pixie, you can change your name by common usage, but only up to a point. If you want to change it for good it will have to be by deed poll. Elton John in court would be charged as Elton John. Tommy Robinson won't be charged as Tommy Robinson.
Question Author
Possibly. Probably be ruled inadmissible from what I've seen of the 'justice' system's attitude where TR is concerned.
Question Author
He used a pseudonym to protect his family from violence, etc.
Liberal clowns doxxed his family.
//Best keep quiet for the sake of diversity//

What the actual feck? I know you love to blame everything on us snowflake SJWs, but what has anything in this sorry tale got to do with diversity?
if he didn't keep going to court nobody would hear his real name, but every time he's charged...

Last time the judge referred to an aggravating feature was his previous offending and referred to "his 11 convictions including for offences of violence, public order, disobedience to court orders, and fraud."

Maybe he's trying to suggest that Stephen Yaxley-Lennon is a habitual criminal but Tommy Robinson is a little angel. His fanboys here certainly think so.
Question Author
The actual feck, as you put it, is it was an 'asian' gentleman involved (possible set-up?) and 'keep quiet for the sake of diversity' is a well known saying made (in)famous by a Labour MP.

101 to 120 of 290rss feed

First Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Tommy In Trouble Again...

Answer Question >>

Related Questions