Film, Media & TV4 mins ago
Tommy In Trouble Again...
Answers
I wouldn't depend on the tabloids to report the truth.... especially when they're on the warpath against someone.
00:15 Tue 03rd Mar 2020
hereIam - // There is only the furore on here because as lb says, it is Tommy Robinson. //
There's only a furore anywhere because it is 'Tommy Robinson' - and who do you think bears responbsibility for that?
// He's my hero too SK … //
Good for you!
// ... and ignore a-h having a pop, who the hell cares about him ??? I don't //
Oh! How wounding!!!
There's only a furore anywhere because it is 'Tommy Robinson' - and who do you think bears responbsibility for that?
// He's my hero too SK … //
Good for you!
// ... and ignore a-h having a pop, who the hell cares about him ??? I don't //
Oh! How wounding!!!
Spicerack - // As to recording his daughter He constantly records things we wouldn't as a defence against the MSM and the police who tend to make up their own version of events where TR is concerned. If he wasn't arrested, we wouldn't have seen it. (imo) //
Personally, I would be comforting my daughter, not interviewing her on camera.
But that aside, recording his own stupidity for 'self-protection' is one thing - recording his traumatised child, and sticking it on the internet, that is entirely another.
Personally, I would be comforting my daughter, not interviewing her on camera.
But that aside, recording his own stupidity for 'self-protection' is one thing - recording his traumatised child, and sticking it on the internet, that is entirely another.
Spicerack - // He used a pseudonym to protect his family from violence, etc. //
Putting your face and voice all over the Internet on a virtually daily basis, and attracting as much attention as you can to your personal views is not an assured way of protecting your anonymity - and tacking on the name of a convicted football hooligan is not a major defence mechanism either!
If either you, or he, seriously thought that adopting a stage name was going to make him anonymous, then both of you clearly don't understand the power of publicity.
Putting your face and voice all over the Internet on a virtually daily basis, and attracting as much attention as you can to your personal views is not an assured way of protecting your anonymity - and tacking on the name of a convicted football hooligan is not a major defence mechanism either!
If either you, or he, seriously thought that adopting a stage name was going to make him anonymous, then both of you clearly don't understand the power of publicity.
I'd be interested to know the timeline of the videoes.
The 'arrest' part is obviously post-thumping the suspect. The 'justified' part is on his release from custody; so when did he film the conversation with his daughter?
Just after the assault? In which case he was letting the suspect get away.....(something he wasted no time in accusing the Police of allowing).
Between thump and arrest? In which case his daughter had already been assaulted and watched her Daddy lump someone.
Post-custodial release? In which case he really had no reason to traumatise his daughter further.....the one who had been assaulted, watched her daddy lump someone and then be worried that he was being taken off to prison because of something she had told him.
The 'arrest' part is obviously post-thumping the suspect. The 'justified' part is on his release from custody; so when did he film the conversation with his daughter?
Just after the assault? In which case he was letting the suspect get away.....(something he wasted no time in accusing the Police of allowing).
Between thump and arrest? In which case his daughter had already been assaulted and watched her Daddy lump someone.
Post-custodial release? In which case he really had no reason to traumatise his daughter further.....the one who had been assaulted, watched her daddy lump someone and then be worried that he was being taken off to prison because of something she had told him.
jack - // I'd be interested to know the timeline of the videoes.
The 'arrest' part is obviously post-thumping the suspect. The 'justified' part is on his release from custody; so when did he film the conversation with his daughter?
Just after the assault? In which case he was letting the suspect get away.....(something he wasted no time in accusing the Police of allowing).
Between thump and arrest? In which case his daughter had already been assaulted and watched her Daddy lump someone.
Post-custodial release? In which case he really had no reason to traumatise his daughter further.....the one who had been assaulted, watched her daddy lump someone and then be worried that he was being taken off to prison because of something she had told him. //
You need to be down with the programme here.
There is nothing - NOTHING - more vital than 'Tommy Robinson' getting a chance to play the victim, even vicariously through his child.
Getting his mug on the net and telling his latest tale of woe trumps absolutely everything - seeing if the alleged offender was caught, making sure his child is ok, checking that his other children and his wife are alright …
All those can wait - just get that film our there and let the world know that once again 'Tommy Robinson' has been done wrong.
The 'arrest' part is obviously post-thumping the suspect. The 'justified' part is on his release from custody; so when did he film the conversation with his daughter?
Just after the assault? In which case he was letting the suspect get away.....(something he wasted no time in accusing the Police of allowing).
Between thump and arrest? In which case his daughter had already been assaulted and watched her Daddy lump someone.
Post-custodial release? In which case he really had no reason to traumatise his daughter further.....the one who had been assaulted, watched her daddy lump someone and then be worried that he was being taken off to prison because of something she had told him. //
You need to be down with the programme here.
There is nothing - NOTHING - more vital than 'Tommy Robinson' getting a chance to play the victim, even vicariously through his child.
Getting his mug on the net and telling his latest tale of woe trumps absolutely everything - seeing if the alleged offender was caught, making sure his child is ok, checking that his other children and his wife are alright …
All those can wait - just get that film our there and let the world know that once again 'Tommy Robinson' has been done wrong.
Spicerack - // Yes, well you've famously been made to look a mug previously, Andy. //
'Famously'??? You flatter me! I have never done anything 'famous' in my life!!!!
// Remember when you relied on the Daily Mail/Police version of events to spout page after page of pure drivel when TR was ejected from a Cambridge pub.
Everyone else had watched Tommy's video, so didn't. //
Actually, I don't remember - like anything associated with 'Tommy Robinson', five seconds after I have walked away from my computer I have forgotten all about him and his stupid nonsense.
'Famously'??? You flatter me! I have never done anything 'famous' in my life!!!!
// Remember when you relied on the Daily Mail/Police version of events to spout page after page of pure drivel when TR was ejected from a Cambridge pub.
Everyone else had watched Tommy's video, so didn't. //
Actually, I don't remember - like anything associated with 'Tommy Robinson', five seconds after I have walked away from my computer I have forgotten all about him and his stupid nonsense.
//The actual feck, as you put it, is it was an 'asian' gentleman involved (possible set-up?)//
Why doesn't that surprise me. I was dubious of the whole thing initially, doubly so now.
//'keep quiet for the sake of diversity' is a well known saying made (in)famous by a Labour MP//
Must've missed that one.
Why doesn't that surprise me. I was dubious of the whole thing initially, doubly so now.
//'keep quiet for the sake of diversity' is a well known saying made (in)famous by a Labour MP//
Must've missed that one.
Jno //pixie, you can change your name by common usage, but only up to a point. If you want to change it for good it will have to be by deed poll. Elton John in court would be charged as Elton John. Tommy Robinson won't be charged as Tommy Robinson.//
That isn't accurate. If it's legal, it's legal. Nobody actually changes their name, we are all registered under our "real names" (at birth) when we die. Whether people choose to temporarily call themselves something different while they are alive, is up to them. Lots of women register a different name, after marriage. It is just as legal too, just not permanent.
That isn't accurate. If it's legal, it's legal. Nobody actually changes their name, we are all registered under our "real names" (at birth) when we die. Whether people choose to temporarily call themselves something different while they are alive, is up to them. Lots of women register a different name, after marriage. It is just as legal too, just not permanent.
JTH,
It would be interesting to know if SYL reported the alleged sexual assault to Center Parcs staff, and the Police. The Police were called after the Asian man was assaulted. Did the Asians phone the police?
SYL could also have further prosecution problems because he called the men paedophiles and homosexuals, and they probably aren’t. Slander and libel actions on top of the assault charge would be unfortunate, especially for a journalist.
It would be interesting to know if SYL reported the alleged sexual assault to Center Parcs staff, and the Police. The Police were called after the Asian man was assaulted. Did the Asians phone the police?
SYL could also have further prosecution problems because he called the men paedophiles and homosexuals, and they probably aren’t. Slander and libel actions on top of the assault charge would be unfortunate, especially for a journalist.
pix - // Jno //pixie, you can change your name by common usage, but only up to a point. If you want to change it for good it will have to be by deed poll. Elton John in court would be charged as Elton John. Tommy Robinson won't be charged as Tommy Robinson.//
That isn't accurate. If it's legal, it's legal. //
I think it is accurate.
Elton John's passport almost certainly says 'Elton John' under 'Name' - 'Tommy Robinson's almost certainly doesn't.
That isn't accurate. If it's legal, it's legal. //
I think it is accurate.
Elton John's passport almost certainly says 'Elton John' under 'Name' - 'Tommy Robinson's almost certainly doesn't.
Latest Posts
ChatterBank8 mins ago
Society & Culture13 mins ago
Body & Soul24 mins ago
Crosswords30 mins ago
