Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Only Females Menstruate
Am I missing something here?
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-8 083431/ Exeter- Univers ity-eco nomics- lecture r-brand ed-tran sphobic -LGBT-f eminist -studen ts.html
"The row erupted when Dr Poen responded to a tweet by a Twitter user called 'Lilo the Autistic Queer' which read: 'Not everyone who menstruates is female. Not everyone who is female menstruates. Let's shift our language.'"
I hate to break it to 'Lilo the Autistic Queer', but the ONLY people who menstruate are women.
On a scale on 1 to 10, with 10 being you're a total ***, how much of a *** is 'Lilo the Autistic Queer'?
https:/
"The row erupted when Dr Poen responded to a tweet by a Twitter user called 'Lilo the Autistic Queer' which read: 'Not everyone who menstruates is female. Not everyone who is female menstruates. Let's shift our language.'"
I hate to break it to 'Lilo the Autistic Queer', but the ONLY people who menstruate are women.
On a scale on 1 to 10, with 10 being you're a total ***, how much of a *** is 'Lilo the Autistic Queer'?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Deskdiary. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Your Answer...////What people mean by given words is irrelevant. Hes are hes and she’s are shes.//
Bullocks. The intent of the speaker is uncountably the most important thing. It's the difference between deliberately insulting people and possibly upsetting a snowflake of two.
The first is the work of an ***. The second can be solved with an explanation or apology.//
That was me supposedly calling you an ***.
As is clear, I'm saying if its someone's intent to deliberately insult a person, that's the actions of a ***. You're not mentioned at all here, it's all metaphorical, and is only in response to the first sentence in your quote.
I don't expect an apology from you Naomi, as its not really your way, but it would be nice.
Bullocks. The intent of the speaker is uncountably the most important thing. It's the difference between deliberately insulting people and possibly upsetting a snowflake of two.
The first is the work of an ***. The second can be solved with an explanation or apology.//
That was me supposedly calling you an ***.
As is clear, I'm saying if its someone's intent to deliberately insult a person, that's the actions of a ***. You're not mentioned at all here, it's all metaphorical, and is only in response to the first sentence in your quote.
I don't expect an apology from you Naomi, as its not really your way, but it would be nice.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.