//...had their boobs removed/flattened but their reproductive organs and feeding apparatus preserved so they can have children and naturally feed them. "Birthing parent" and "chestfeeding" works then, ...//
How does that work? How can "feeding apparatus" be preserved if they've had "boobs removed/flattened"?
Quite rightly, mushroom. I suspect it may get to a point where it is allowed to lie on your child's birth certificate (look at Elton John...) but changing words doesn't change truth.
Nothing is "getting out of hand". This is a meaningless distraction, applying to nobody here. Simply use the vocabulary that you feel is appropriate for the person you are dealing with; if there's any ambiguity or disagreement, then it's your choice to pick a battle over it or not, but it should be clear that it's infinitely more important to provide people with healthcare and ensure that they feel comfortable than it is to make a political point about gender theory.
ummmm: "I think we were answering to TTT's 'end of' comment. That's like he's not inviting a debate. He's chosen so it's END OF....me ole China. " - not at all, I used "end of" because there is no ambiguity, a woman that has given birth is a mother, there is no possible point to discuss. There are other aspects to debate.
// Does their discomfort take precedence over mine mine? //
If you were the carer of a patient, then yes, of course it does. The patient's needs come first in healthcare.
Incidentally, the advice is being misrepresented massively, because of course it is. There's no obligation to use the term "chest feeding" in *all* cases, or indeed at all. This is advice.