Music0 min ago
Is This A Waste Of Money?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ichkeria. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.https:/ /www.bm j.com/c ontent/ 372/bmj .n706
Based on the numbers reported in there, this could even end up picking more false positives than true positives. That sounds like a recipe for chaos.
Based on the numbers reported in there, this could even end up picking more false positives than true positives. That sounds like a recipe for chaos.
Because(a) that's a hasty generalisation: although many young people suffer little from Covid, not all do, and in any case death is only one long-term effect from the disease; and (b) vaccines never offer fully protection to everybody, so if the disease is allowed to run rampant again then it would break through the protection offered by vaccines, presumably with a lower but still significant death toll.
It (probably) isn't a requirement to vaccinate everybody, by the way -- you just need to vaccinate enough, and hope that the disease doesn't mutate beyond the scope of it; perhaps also with reasonable border control policies to ensure that travellers need to demonstrate a negative test on arrival/departure, to reduce the possibility of variants arriving.
Regardless of the details, there's no reason to despair about never achieving a fully-vaccinated population, be it because of lack of resources or lack of compliance. Herd immunity is also a thing, and if you assume that the required threshold is in the region of 80%-90% then we are well on track to meet that in the coming months.
Regardless of the details, there's no reason to despair about never achieving a fully-vaccinated population, be it because of lack of resources or lack of compliance. Herd immunity is also a thing, and if you assume that the required threshold is in the region of 80%-90% then we are well on track to meet that in the coming months.