'In his cross-examination of Mercil, Nelson offered a couple examples to the use-of-force coordinator.
“If they’re cheering on and saying, ‘Good job, officer,’ that’s one consideration,” Nelson said to Mercil. “But if they’re saying, ‘I’d slap the [expletive] out of you’ or ‘You’re a [expletive]’ or ‘You’re a chump,’ would that reasonably tend to rise alarm in a police officer?”
After Mercil agreed that it would, the prosecution only had one other follow-up to Nelson’s example.
“And if they’re saying, ‘Get off him, you’re killing him,’ should the officer also take that into account and consider whether their actions need to be reassessed?” asked one of the prosecutors.
“Potentially, sir, yes,” Mercil replied.'
"would that reasonably tend to rise alarm in a police officer?” is somewhat different from, "would that be sufficient to cause the officers to be alarmed about the prospect of imminent physical violence from the bystanders?"