ChatterBank3 mins ago
Boris's Debt
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The matter has been to court , and judgement was made against him .
So they are only now going to apply to have the judgement set aside?
This was in October .
What has he or his bag carriers done about it in
all this time? - Zilch by the sound of it even though reminders would have been sent .
Probably thought ,just ignore it .
The amount of money in question might not be much to some but it may be a lot to others , hence the matter being pursued through the courts
So they are only now going to apply to have the judgement set aside?
This was in October .
What has he or his bag carriers done about it in
all this time? - Zilch by the sound of it even though reminders would have been sent .
Probably thought ,just ignore it .
The amount of money in question might not be much to some but it may be a lot to others , hence the matter being pursued through the courts
The case was brought against B.J. at 10 Downing Street in October 2020 and was done online! The case number is 161MC959 and if you care to pay £6.00 you can find out who it is. :)) Meanwhile Downing St says "An application will be made for an order to set aside the default judgment, to strike out the claim and for a declaration that the claim is totally without merit.” Ahh everybody back on the bus(you know which one) and you can now release the clutch on your tinkies and stop dancing up and down. Here is the link ... pay the fee if you think it is genuine.
https:/ /search .trusto nline.o rg.uk/S earch/C aseNumb er
https:/
Have you checked whether you have a judgement against you in the last 7 months? Someone may have taken out a mischief claim, online, without your knowledge. Do you really think that the "organisations" that are making the "reports" have not checked the claim? If I can find the claim number in 2 minutes, and the means to check it, do you honestly think that they have not? After all it is our stolen money they use for such things. Why would they not then publish the claimants identity? I am becoming more convinced that it is a collective mental illness that seeks and promotes this dog whistle behaviour. More concerning is the fact that this site allows it ... after the proud announcement, not too long ago, that non factual assertions would be removed and persistent posters of such tripe would face sanction.
//If a judgement was made against me , I would be notified of it//
What if the "notifications" were sent next door? Do you know how you are notified after an online claim?
Has no-one paid the £6.00 yet? When you do will you announce the claimant or decide not to say like all the left wing tub thumpers?
What if the "notifications" were sent next door? Do you know how you are notified after an online claim?
Has no-one paid the £6.00 yet? When you do will you announce the claimant or decide not to say like all the left wing tub thumpers?