News1 min ago
Answers
// lots of people out of the Olympics // indeed. i guess the point of raising this is that Ms Hubbard's exit postpones an inevitable argument.... ..
14:10 Mon 02nd Aug 2021
"Mozz, no backtracking from me. He’s a bloke."
You can deny and deny Naomi but the Olympics allowed this person to compete in the woman's events. That means a lot more than your opinion. Just because you keep saying something doesn't make it true. I understand your position but you're coming across as a nasty piece of work. Not worth the discussion IMO if you just say things unwilling to discuss or think openly.
She competed in woman's weightlifting. - Enough said no argument no denial that's what happened.
You can deny and deny Naomi but the Olympics allowed this person to compete in the woman's events. That means a lot more than your opinion. Just because you keep saying something doesn't make it true. I understand your position but you're coming across as a nasty piece of work. Not worth the discussion IMO if you just say things unwilling to discuss or think openly.
She competed in woman's weightlifting. - Enough said no argument no denial that's what happened.
Spicerack - // Trust me, neither of you are intelligent enough to know what I'm thinking. //
Speaking personally, you are not intelligent enough to know what I'm thinking either, but that's a given, not something I feel the need to boast about on here.
The fact is, you presented an OP in such a way that more than one person has reached logical conclusions about your ideas on the subject, which given the absence of any information from you, is perfectly reasonable.
If you find those conclusions are not in line with your thinking, then the fault is squarely yours for not adivising your ideas in your OP.
People are not mind readers, but they are clever enough to deduce a reasonable assumptin from scant information.
If you are not happy that peole get the wrong idea, then explain yourself properly in the first place.
Don't be cryptic, and then get snitty when people fail to grasp your point, because you didn't make it for it to be grasped in the first place.
Speaking personally, you are not intelligent enough to know what I'm thinking either, but that's a given, not something I feel the need to boast about on here.
The fact is, you presented an OP in such a way that more than one person has reached logical conclusions about your ideas on the subject, which given the absence of any information from you, is perfectly reasonable.
If you find those conclusions are not in line with your thinking, then the fault is squarely yours for not adivising your ideas in your OP.
People are not mind readers, but they are clever enough to deduce a reasonable assumptin from scant information.
If you are not happy that peole get the wrong idea, then explain yourself properly in the first place.
Don't be cryptic, and then get snitty when people fail to grasp your point, because you didn't make it for it to be grasped in the first place.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.